Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:19:06.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Finding a Role for Mediation in Workplace Disputes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Ray Fells*
Affiliation:
Department of Organisational and Labour Studies, University of Western Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In June, 1999, the Federal Coalition government proposed further reforms of the Australian industrial relations system. Included in this reform package were proposals for a Mediation Adviser to oversee the use of mediation in industrial relations. The paper critically examines these proposals. Data from a survey of WA practitioners indicates that the core elements of mediation are seen as self-responsibility and voluntariness which clearly distinguish it from the traditional processes of conciliation by the tribunal. However, there is also uncertainty over the nature of mediation and how it might operate in the context of, or as an alternative to, the present framework of dispute resolution. The government’s package of reforms, including those relating to mediation, were withdrawn but the interest in mediation remains. This paper suggests that rather than creating a new industrial relations agency (the Mediation Adviser), making provision for mediation by Industrial Commissioners with the parties still able to choose private mediation if they wish would achieve the desired policy objectives.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2000

Footnotes

*

The assistance of Bob Horstman in the preparation of this paper is acknowledged.

References

ALRC (1998), Review of the Adversarial System of Litigation: ADR — its role in federal dispute resolution issues, Australian Law Reform Commission, Sydney.Google Scholar
Boland, R. (1999), ‘The Prospects for Mediation Having a Fromal Role in Australia’s Industrial Relations System’ Australian Industry Group, Sydney.Google Scholar
Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., Power, D., McCabe Power, M. (1996) ‘Global Implications of Recent Innovations in U.S. Collective Bargaining’ Relations Industrielles 51, 281300.Google Scholar
Davis, E. (1998), ‘Mediation within Enterprise Bargaining: New South Wales Fire Brigade 1995’ Australian Dispute Resloution Journal 9(1) pp. 510.Google Scholar
DOPLAR (1997), Labour Relations Reform Discussion Paper, Department of Productivity and Labour Relations, Perth.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J.T., Zack, A.M. (1997), Mediation and Arbitration of Employment Disputes, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education Legislation Committee, The Senate, http://www.aph.gov.au.hansard/senate/committee/sewrbe.htm Google Scholar
Fells, R. (1997), ‘What might be the role for mediation in the future development of workplace and industrial relations?’, Occasional Papers December, 1997, Industrial Relations Society of WA.Google Scholar
Fells, R. (1999), ‘Settlement process of tactical opportunity? Different perspectives on the role of mediation in industrial disputes’ Journal of Industrial Relations 41 (4) pp. 594611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuille, P. (1975), ‘Final Offer Arbitration and the Chilling Effect’, Industrial Relations 14(3) pp. 302310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuille, P., Kolb, D.M. (1994), ‘Waiting in the Wings: Mediation’s Role in Grievance Resolution’, Negotiation Journal 10, pp. 249264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foenander, O. (1959), Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration in Australia, Law Book Co., Sydney.Google Scholar
Honeyman, C. (1995), Performance-Based Assessment, National Institute for Dispute Resolution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
ILO (1983), Conciliation Services: Structures, Functions and Techniques, International Labour Office, Geneva.Google Scholar
Industrial Relations Taskforce (1998), ‘Review of Industrial Relations Legislation in Queensland’, Department of Employment, Training and Industrial Relations, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Karassavidou, E., Markovits, Y. (1996), ‘The evolution of dispute resolution, negotiation and mediation in Greece’, Relations Industrielles 51, pp. 357389.Google Scholar
Liberal and National Parties (1998), More Jobs Better Pay Google Scholar
Lowry, P. (1990), Employment Disputes and the Third Party, Macmillan, Lonon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, E.P., Berkeley, A.E. (1996), Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Workplace, Quorum Books, Westport, Conn.Google Scholar
Macken, J.J., Gregory, G. (1995), Mediation of Industrial Disputes, Federation Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Niland, J. (1989), Transforming Industrial Relations in New South Wales, Department of Industrial Relations and Employment, Sydney.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. (1998), ‘The quandry of setting standard for mediators: where are we headed?’, Queens Law Journal 23, pp. 441474.Google Scholar
Reith, P. (1998), Approaches to dispute resolution: a role for mediation?, Department for Employment and Workplace Relations, Canberra.Google Scholar
Reith, P. (1999i), The Continuing Reform of Workplace Relations: Implementation of More Jobs, Better Pay, Department for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business, Canberra.Google Scholar
Reith, P. (1999ii) Speech given at the Industrial Relations Society National Convention, Perth, October, 1999.Google Scholar
Simkin, W.E., Fidandis, N.A. (1986), Mediation and the Dynamics of Collective Bargaining, Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
SPIDR (1978), New Dimensions in Dispute Resolution, Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Stitt, A.J. (1998), Alternative Dispute Resolution for Organizations, John Wiley, Toronto.Google Scholar
Workplace Relations Act, 1996 Google Scholar
Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (More Jobs, Better Pay) Bill, 1999Google Scholar
Zack, A.M. (1997), ‘Can alternative dispute resolution help resolve employment disputes?’, International Labour Review, 136, pp. 95108.Google Scholar