Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:11:25.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fightback in Perspective: What Difference Would it Make?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J.W. Nevile
J.W. Nevile*
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Economic Research, University of New South Wales
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article examines the economic, as opposed to social, effects of the Fightback package and concludes that both beneficial and adverse effects of the tax measures have been exaggerated. The switch from various taxes to a GST will increase efficiency but only slightly and will have a neglible effect on labour supply and savings. Adverse effects on small business and on federal financial relationships will not have a large impact on the economy. The superannuation proposals will probably reduce savings. The most important effect of the package may be to increase unemployment as a result of the emphasis on enterprise bargaining combined with a determination to prevent any rise in the rate of inflation following the introduction of a GST.

Type
Symposium: The Coalition Fightback Package
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , June 1992 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1992

References

Brown, E.C. (1950), ‘Analysis of Consumption Taxes in Terms of the Theory of Income Determination’, American Economic Review, March.Google Scholar
Friedman, B.M. (1992), ‘Learning from the Reagan Deficits’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 4022.Google Scholar
Kyriakopoulos, J. (1991), ‘Does Moderate Inflation Affect Economic Growth?’ in Johnson, M.R., Kriesler, P., Owen, A.D. (eds), Contemporary Issues in Australian Economics, Macmillan Australia, Crows Nest and South Melbourne.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. (1992), ‘GST and the Inflation Rate’ paper presented at the Centre for Economic Policy Research, ANU Conference on Consumption Taxes in Canberra.Google Scholar
Nevile, J.W. (1986), ‘Quantitative Estimates of the Macroeconomic Effects of a Shift from Direct to Indirect Taxes in Australia’ in Head, J. (ed)), Changing the Tax Mix, Australian Tax Research Foundation, Sydney.Google Scholar
Nevile, J.W. (1990), ‘Comments on inflation: Performance and Policy’ in Grenville, S. (ed), The Australian Macro-Economy in the 1980s, Research Department, Reserve Bank of Australia, Sydney.Google Scholar
Piggott, J. (1992), ‘The ANU Consumption Tax Conference — Summary and Assessment’, Australian Quarterly, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W. (1985), Reindustrialisation and Technology, Longman, Harlow Essex.Google Scholar
Sandford, C. (1986), ‘Value-Added Tax — United Kingdom Experience’ in Head, J. (ed), Changing the Tax Mix, Australian Tax Research Foundation, Sydney.Google Scholar
Tait, A.A. (1991), ‘VAT Policy Issues: Structure, Regressive, Inflation, and Exports’, in IMF Occasional Papers, No. 88, Washington.Google Scholar
Torney, J. (1992), ‘Inflation and the GST’, Growth, forthcoming.Google Scholar