No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Dynamics and Dimensions of Industrial Relations Change: A Comparative Analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This paper summarises the conclusion of an OECD-based study on the nature and dynamics of change in industrial relations. A number of industrialised market countries are examined, six of which — Australia, Japan, Britain, the United States of America, West Germany and Sweden — are the focus of a detailed study. Successive parts of the paper examine the experience of change, the agents of change, factors facilitating change, and barriers to change. The paper concludes with several generalised propositions about the macro change process drawn from the experience of the countries reviewed, and a review of policy options.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 1990
Footnotes
The paper is distilled from the authors’ edited work, Agenda for Change: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Relations in Transition, Allen and Unwin, Sydney, forthcoming.
References
Addison, J. (1979) Wage Policies and Collective Bargaining Developments in Finland, Ireland and Norway, OEDC, Paris.Google Scholar
Ahlen, K. (1988) Recent Trends in Swedish Bargaining: Collapse of the Swedish Models, Swedish Institute, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Amadieu, J.F., (1986) ‘Les tendances du syndicalisme d'enterprise en France: Quelques hypotheses’, in Droit Social, 6, June, p495.Google Scholar
Barbash, J. (1984) The Work Ethic: an Analytical View, Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel (1986) ‘The Emergence of Community Labour-Management Cooperation’, in Woodworth, Warner, Meek, Christopher, Whyte, William Foote (eds), Industrial Democracy; Strategies for Community Revitalization, Sage, Beverly Hills, California.Google Scholar
Gould, W.B. (1984) Japan’s Reshaping of American Labor Law, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O., in Flanders, A., Clegg, H.A. (eds) (1954) The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lash, S. (1985) ‘The End of Neo-corporatism? The Breakdown of Centralised Bargaining in Sweden’, in British Journal of Industrial Relations, July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, E. (1985) ‘The Rise and Fall of the Swedish Models in Journal of Economic Literature, vol 23, March.Google Scholar
Moss, B.H. (1988) ‘Industrial Law Reform is an Era of Retreat: The Auroux Laws in France, in Work’, Employment and Society, vol 2 no 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrdal, H.G. (1980) ‘The Swedish Model — Will it Survive?’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niland, J. (1986) ‘Process and Strategy in Industrial Relations Reform’, in Blandy, J., Niland, J. (eds) Alternatives to Arbitration, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Niland, J.(1987) “Gaining Against the Tide: Australian Unionism in the 1980s”, Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations 16.Google Scholar
Niland, J.(1989) Transforming Industrial Relations in New South Wales: A Green Paper, NSW Government Publishing Service, Sydney, Vol 1, 270pp.Google Scholar
Niland, J.(1990) Transforming Industrial Relations in New South Wales: A Green Paper, NSW Government Publishing Service, Sydney, Vol 2, 213pp.Google Scholar
Strath, Bo (1986) ‘Redundancy and Solidarity: Tripartite Politics and the Contraction of the West European Shipbuilding Industry’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 10, pp147–163.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. (forthcoming) ‘Le plus ca Change’, in Frenkel, S., Clarke, O. (eds), Economic Restructuring and Industrial Relations, Bulletin 18, Institute for Labour Relations, Leuves.Google Scholar
Weiss, Manfred (1987) Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the Federal Republic of Germany, Kluwer, Deventer.Google Scholar
You have
Access