Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:54:31.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Duality of Labour and the Financial Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Dick Bryan
Dick Bryan*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The current financial crisis has meant a sudden drying-up of the widely-assumed basis of profitability and capital accumulation — reward for entrepreneurship or risk. In this context, it is timely to revisit the Marxian concept that profits derive from the dual role of labour, as both a commodity and a non-commodity. Surplus is created by the difference between the commodity dimension of labour, the value of labour power, and its non-commodity dimension — the value added by labour, over and above the value of inputs, or the cost of reproducing the workforce. Since the 1980s and 1990s, however, labour has become a commodity in a new sense. Risks to working class self-reproduction in the form of wage decline and withdrawal of state welfare, have pushed workers into becoming entrepreneurs of their own lives, calculating the risks of debt servicing and involuntarily buying services from privatised and financialised utilities and health care providers. In this sense, newly commodified labour is required to treat itself as a commercial entity, and it is thereby a player in the market for risk. The reproduction of labour power has itself become a source of surplus value, in the form of interest payments. But, as indicated by the US sub-prime housing market and its fall-out, capital now shares in the risk, through a fall in the value of labour power (lower consumption), and through incalculable financial instability.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , July 2010 , pp. 49 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2010

References

Bryan, D. (2008) ‘Minimum living standards and the working class surplus: Higgins, Henderson and Housing’, Labour History, 95, pp. 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, D., Rafferty, M. (2006), Capitalism with Derivatives: A Political Economy of Financial Derivatives, Capital and Class, Palgrave Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, D., Rafferty, M. (2007a) ‘Financial derivatives: Bubble or anchor?’ in Assassi, L., Nesvetailova, A., Wigan, D. (eds) Global Finance in the New Century, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Bryan, D., Rafferty, M. (2007b) ‘Financial derivatives and the theory of money’, Economy and Society, 36(1), pp. 134–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. Y. (2006) ‘Household finance’, Journal of Finance, 61(4), pp. 1553–1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, F. (1877) Anti-Dühring, Part II: Political Economy VII. Capital and Surplus Value, available: http://www.marx.org/archive/marx/works/1877/anti-duhring/ch19.htm [accessed 21 February 2010].Google Scholar
European Central Bank (2008) ‘The incentive structure of the originate and distribute model’, December, available: http://www.ecb.eu/pub/pdf/other/incentivestructureoriginatedistributemodel200812en.pdf [accessed 21 February 2010].Google Scholar
Himmelweit, S. (1987) ‘Domestic labour’ in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) The New Palgrave, I, Macmillan, London, pp. 914–916.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2005) Global financial stability report, April, available: http://www.imf.org/External/Pubs/FT/GFSR/2005/01/index.htm [accessed 21 February 2010].Google Scholar
Laker, John F. (Chairman, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority) (2007) ‘Credit standards in housing lending — Some further insights', The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia, Melbourne, 20 June, available: http://www.apra.gov.au/Speeches/upload/04-Chart-Acctnts-MN-20-Jun-07.pdf [accessed 21 February 2010].Google Scholar
Lapavitsas, C. (2009) ‘Financialised capitalism: Crisis and financial expropriation’, Historical Materialism, 17(2), pp. 114–148.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1867), Capital I, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (2002), The Financialization of Daily Life, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Nomura [Online] (2006) MBS basics, 31 March, available: http://www.adelsonandjacob.com/pubs/MBS_Basics.pdf [accessed 08 December 2008].Google Scholar
Panitch, L., Gindin, S. (2008) ‘The current crisis: A socialist perspective’, The Bullet, 142(September 30), available: http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/bullet142.html [accessed 21 February 2010].Google Scholar
Vogel, L. (1983), Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar