Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:01:24.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Devolution, Job Enrichment and Workplace Performance in Sri Lanka's Garment Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Ananda Jayawardana
Affiliation:
School of Management, Marketing and International Business, Australian National University
Michael O’Donnell
Affiliation:
School of Management, Marketing and International Business, Australian National University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The article examines the impact, in one Sri Lankan garment industry, of a management initiative devolving to line employees the responsibility for decision-making about workplace performance. At the time of the study, garment manufacturers in Sri Lanka faced increased pressure from international buyers to improve product quality and to meet stringent production delivery schedules, along with growing concerns from Western consumers regarding factory conditions and labour standards. One outcome of these pressures was increased experimentation with a range of quality management techniques to elicit workforce commitment to improved efficiency levels and higher quality standards. This study documents one experiment whereby production line operators rotated the role of production supervisor amongst themselves and accepted responsibility for minimising production bottlenecks, and for communicating data on workplace efficiency, product reject rates and absenteeism levels to other line operators. We found that workplace productivity and product quality increased over the 18-month period of the study, while levels of labour turnover and absenteeism declined. Nevertheless, the study also found that the increased role in workplace decision-making provided to employees also came with increased expectations that line employees would achieve higher production targets, improve quality and monitor workplace attendance.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2009

References

Akuratiyagamage, V. M. (2005) ‘Identification of management development needs: A comparison across companies of different ownership — foreign, joint venture and local in Sri Lanka’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16 (8), pp. 15121528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, C., Lovell, K. (2003) ‘The effects of high performance work systems on employees in aged care’, Labour and Industry, 13(3), pp. 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, E., Batt, R. (1994) The New American Workplace, ILR Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., Kalleberg, A. (2000) Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Work Systems Pay Off, ILR Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Barker, J. (1993) ‘Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams', Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), pp. 408437.Google Scholar
Board of Investment (2001) An Overview of Textile and Apparel Sector, Annual report, Board of Investment of Sri Lanka, Columbo.Google Scholar
Boxall, P., Purcell, J. (2003) Strategy and Human Resource Management, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Central Bank (2001) Future Challenges of the Apparel Industry, Central Bank Annual Report, Columbo.Google Scholar
Central Bank of Sri Lanka (2002) Annual Report, Columbo.Google Scholar
Danford, A. (2003) ‘Workers, unions and the high performance workplace’, Work, Employment and Society, 17(3), pp. 569573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, C., Gardner, W. (2004) ‘Transition to self-directed work teams: Implications of transition time and self-monitoring for managers' use of influence tactics', Journal of Organisational Behavior, 25, pp. 4765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. (1979) Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Fair Labour Association (2004) Third party complaint regarding a facility contracted by Nike in Sri Lanka, Fair Labour Association Annual Report, Washington.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (1974) Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations, Faber, London.Google Scholar
Godard, J. (2004) ‘A critical assessment of the high-performance paradigm’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42, pp. 349378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godard, J., Delaney, J. (2000) ‘Reflections on the “high performance” paradigm's implications for industrial relations as a field’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53(3), pp. 482502.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. (2001) ‘High-involvement work practices, turnover and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand’, Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), pp. 180190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. R., Oldham, G. R. (1975) ‘Development of the job diagnostic survey’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, pp. 159170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. R., Oldham, G. R., Janson, R., Purdy, K. (1975) ‘A new strategy for job enrichment’, California Management Review, pp. 5771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hales, C. (2000) ‘Management and empowerment programmes', Work, Employment and Society, 14(3), pp. 501519.Google Scholar
Harley, B. (2001) ‘Team membership and the experience of work in Britain: An analysis of the WERS98 data’, Work Employment and Society, 15(4), pp. 721742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichniowski, C., Kochan, T., Levine, D., Olson, C., Strauss, G. (1996) ‘What works at work: Overview and assessment’, Industrial Relations, 35(3), pp. 299333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Policy Studies (1998) Sri Lanka: State of the Economy — 2003, Institute of Policy Studies, Columbo.Google Scholar
Jayawardana, A. K. L., Fonseka, T. (1996) ‘Self managed teams and organisational performance: Experience of Asian Cotton Mills Ltd., Sri Lanka’, Sri Lankan Journal of Management, 1, pp. 375399.Google Scholar
Kanes, S. (2002) ‘Sri Lanka's garment exports may soon face major problems’, Sri Lankan Exporter, 37.Google Scholar
Kelegama, S., Epparachchi, R. (2002) Productivity, Competitiveness and Job Quality in the Garment Industry in Sri Lanka, International Labour Organisation, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Konovsky, M. A., Pugh, S. D. (1994) ‘Citizenship behavior and social exchange’, Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 656669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, R. A. (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, Second edition.Google Scholar
Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Wall, T. D. (2004) ‘Integrated manufacturing, empowerment, and company performance’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, pp. 641665.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. A., Vandenberg, R. J. (2005) ‘Integrating managerial perceptions and transformational leadership into a work-unit level model of employee involvement’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, pp. 561589.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L. (1996) ‘Trust and breach of the psychological contract’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, pp. 574599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, K. (1994) ‘The conditions and organizational activities of women in Free Trade Zones, Malaysia, Philippines and Sri Lanka, 1970–1990’, in Rowbothern, S., Mitter, S. (eds), Dignity and Daily Bread: New Forms of Economic Organizing Among Poor Women in the Third World, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. (2000) ‘Case studies', in Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 435449.Google Scholar
Spence Laschinger, H. K., Finegan, J. E., Shamian, J., Wilk, P. (2004) ‘A longitudinal analysis of the impact of workplace empowerment on work satisfaction’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, pp. 527545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission (1999) Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Columbo.Google Scholar
Yin, R. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, Third edition.Google Scholar
Zand, D. E. (1972) ‘Trust and managerial problem solving’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, pp. 229247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar