Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:41:21.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Case for Deregulation: Economic Science or Ideology?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J.W. Nevile
J.W. Nevile*
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Economic Research, University of New South Wales
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Economists tend to have a bias towards faith in market forces. For many economists this is re-enforced by a libertarian social philosophy. Professional judgements made by such economists often reflect their social philosophy as much as the conclusions of purely economic analysis.

Type
Article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , December 1990 , pp. 71 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1990

Footnotes

*

This is a revised and abridged version of the “Sir Robert Madgwick Lecture” given at the University of New England in May 1990. The original lecture has been published by the University under the title “Economics and Ideals: Has the Age of Chivalry Gone?”, I am indebted to Ken Rivett and Peter Kriesler for commenting on a draft of tie paper but the usual caveat applies

References

Henderson, D., (1989) Economic liberalism: Australia in an International Setting, CEDA, Sydney.Google Scholar
Pusey, M., (forthcoming) “The Quest for Social Democracy in Australia: What has Changed in Canberra?” in Daniels, Ann (ed), Social Democracy and Social Science: Essays in Honour of Sol Encel, Longmans, Cheshire (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Thurow, L.C., (1983) Dangerous Currents: The State of Economics, Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar