Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:05:21.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can Child Poverty Be Abolished? Promises and Policies in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Holly Sutherland*
Affiliation:
Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1999 Tony Blair, the UK Prime Minister, promised to end child poverty within a generation. What does this mean? Can it be achieved? What progress has been made so far? The paper starts by placing UK child poverty at the end of the 20th Century in historical and international context. It reviews the policies that have been introduced in order to meet specific interim targets - of reducing child poverty by one quarter by 2004/5 and halving it in ten years - and discusses the prospects for success in meeting these targets. The second part takes a step back and reflects on why child poverty - rather than poverty more generally - has become the political and policy focus. It then considers whether such an emphasis - together with the particular policy directions that have been taken - may be counter-productive in meeting the eventual goal of ending child poverty. The ‘end to child poverty’ has now been translated as meaning having achieved a relative child poverty rate that is ‘among the best (i.e. lowest) in Europe’. The final part of the paper considers what this might involve. To what extent can the policy approaches taken by the current ‘best in Europe’ countries be seen as recipes for success for the UK, or indeed elsewhere?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2006

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to John Hills for his permission to draw heavily on our joint work (Hills and Sutherland 2004). The opinions expressed are my own.

References

Adam, S., Brewer, M. (2004) Supporting families: The financial costs and benefits of children since 1975, Policy Press, Bristol.Google Scholar
Barnes, M., Lyon, N., Morris, S., Robinson, V., Yau, Y. Wan (2005) Family Life in Britain: Findings from the 2003 Families and Children Survey (FACS), Department of Work and Pensions Research Report No 250, Corporate Document Services, Leeds.Google Scholar
Blair, T. (1999) ‘Beveridge revisited: A welfare state for the 21st century’ in Ending Child Poverty, Walker, R. (ed), Policy Press, Bristol.Google Scholar
Bradbury, B., Jäntii, M. (2001) ‘Child poverty across twenty-five countries', In The Dynamics of Child Poverty in Industrialised Countries, Bradbury, B., Jenkins, S. P., Micklewright, J. (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J. (2000) ‘Child poverty in comparative perspective’, in Gordon, D., Townsend, P. (eds) Breadline Europe: The measurement of poverty, The Policy Press, Bristol, pp 223–50.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J., Ditch, J., Holmes, H., Whiteford, P. (1993) Support for Children: A comparison of arrangements in fifteen countries, Department of Social Security Research Report No.21, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. (2004) ‘Will the Government hit its child poverty target in, 2004–05?’ Briefing Note 47., Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M., Duncan, A., Shephard, A., Suárez, M. J. (2003) Did Working Families' Tax Credit Work?, Inland Revenue and Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
Brewer, M., Goodman, A., Shaw, J., Shephard, A. (2005) Poverty and Inequality in Britain: 2005, IFS Commentary No. 99, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corak, M., Lietz, C., Sutherland, H. (2005) ‘The Impact of Tax and Transfer Systems on Children in the European Union’, Innocenti Working Paper No. 2005–04. Florence, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. [Online] Available: http://www.unicef.org/irc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, R., Ellwood, D. (2003) ‘Child poverty in Britain and the United States', Economic Journal, 113: F219F239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DWP [Department for Work and Pensions] (2003) Measuring Child Poverty, DWP, London.Google Scholar
DWP (2004) Income Related Benefits: Estimates of Take-Up in 2001/2002, DWP, London.Google Scholar
DWP (2005) Households Below Average Income—An analysis of the income distribution 1994/5 to 2003/04, Corporate Document Services, Leeds.Google Scholar
DWP (2005a) Opportunity for All - Seventh Annual Report 2005, Cm 6673, The Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Gregg, P., Hansen, K., Wadsworth, J. (1999) x2018;The rise of the workless household’, in Gregg, P., Wadsworth, J. (eds) The State of Working Britain, Manchester University Press, pp7589.Google Scholar
Gregg, P., Harkness, S. (2003) ‘Welfare reform and lone parents' employment in the UK', CMPO Working Paper 03/072, University of Bristol, Bristol.Google Scholar
Gregg, P., Wadsworth, J. (2001) ‘Everything you ever wanted to know about measuring worklessness and polarization and the household level but were afraid to ask.’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, Special Issue: 777806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, J. (2005) Inequality and the State, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hills, J., Stewart, K. (2005) ‘A tide turned but mountains yet to climb?’, in Hills, J., Stewart, K. (eds) A More Equal Society? New Labour, poverty, inequality and exclusion, Policy Press, Bristol, pp 325346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, J., Sutherland, H. (2004) ‘Ending Child Poverty in a Generation? Policies and Prospects in the UK’ (mimeo).Google Scholar
HM Treasury (1999) Tackling Poverty and Extending Opportunity, The Modernisation of Britain's Tax and Benefit System No.4., HM Treasury, London.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2004) Budget 2004: Prudence for a Purpose: A Britain of stability and strength, HC 301. TSO, London.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2005) Tax credits: reforming financial support for families, The modernisation of Britain's Tax and Benefit System No. 11, London.Google Scholar
Inland Revenue (2003) Working Families' Tax Credit: Estimates of Take-up rates in 2001–02, Inland Revenue, London.Google Scholar
Levy, H., Lietz, C., Sutherland, H. (2005) ‘Alternative Tax-Benefit Strategies to Support Children in the European Union: recent reforms in Austria, Spain and the United Kingdom’, Innocenti Working Paper No. 2005–07. Florence, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. [Online] Available: http://www.unicef.org/irc.Google Scholar
Low Pay Commission (2005) The National Minimum Wage: The Low Pay Commission Report 2005, Cm.6457, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
McKay, S., Collard, S. (2003) ‘Developing deprivation questions for the Family Resources Survey’, IAD Working Paper 13, Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Redmond, G., Sutherland, H., Wilson, M. (1998) The arithmetic of tax and social security reform: a user's guide to microsimulation methods and analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stewart, K. (2005) “Towards an equal start: Addressing childhood poverty and deprivation”, in Hills, J., Stewart, K. (eds) A More Equal Society? New Labour, poverty, inequality and exclusion, Policy Press, Bristol, pp 143166.Google Scholar
Sutherland, H. (2000) ‘EUROMOD: A tax-benefit model for the European Union’, Transfer, 6(2): 312316.Google Scholar
Sutherland, H. (2002) One Parent Families, Poverty and Labour Policy, National Council for One Parent Families, London.Google Scholar
Sutherland, H., Sefton, T., Piachaud, D. (2003) Poverty in Britain: the impact of government policy since 1997, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.Google Scholar