Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:02:44.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Australia’s Carbon Tax: A Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Clive L. Spash  and
Alex Y. Lo
Clive L. Spash
Affiliation:
WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria; Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway
Alex Y. Lo
Affiliation:
Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Australian Government has produced a CO2-equivalent tax proposal with a difference: it is a short prelude to an emission trading scheme that will allow the increasing rate of emissions to continue, while being a net cost to the Treasury. That cost extends to allowing major emitters to make guaranteed windfall profits from pollution permits. The emission trading scheme suffers numerous problems, but the issues raised in this article show that taxes can also be watered down and made ineffectual through concessions. Taxpayers will get no assets from the billions of dollars to be spent buying-off the coal generators or other polluters. The scheme seeks to stimulate private investors to create an additional 12 per cent in renewable electricity generation by 2020. A really serious emissions reducing alternative would need to create a nationalised electricity sector with 100 per cent renewable energy within a decade. We explore the limitations of Australia’s carbon tax plan which has now passed into law.

Keywords

Q52Q54Q56Q58Australiacarbon taxationclimate changeemission tradinggreenhouse gasesregulationrenewable energy
Type
Symposium
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 23 , Issue 1: Carbon Markets: Inherent Limitations and Complementary Policies , February 2012 , pp. 67 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2012

References

Alexander, C. (2008) ‘Ross Garnaut savages Government over climate scheme’, Herald Sun, 20 December, available: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/garnaut-climate-barrage/story-e6frf7l6-1111118370207 [accessed 10 February 2012].Google Scholar
Australian Government (2008) Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme: Australia’s Low Pollution Future, Volume 1, White Paper, December, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2011) Securing a clean energy future: The Australian Government’s climate change plan, available: http://www.cleanenergyfuture.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Consolidated-Final.pdf [accessed 10 January 2012].Google Scholar
Baranzini, A., Goldemberg, J., Speck, S. (2000) ‘A future for carbon taxes’, Ecological Economics, 32(3), pp. 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyond Zero Emissions (2010) Australian Sustainable Energy: Zero Carbon Australia Stationary Energy Plan — Synopsis, Energy Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Bovenberg, A. L., Goulder, L. H. (1996) ‘Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: General-equilibrium analyses’, American Economic Review, 86(4), pp. 985–1000.Google Scholar
HonCombet, G. (2011) Garnaut Review 2011; Carbon price policy, Transcript, Interview on MTR 1377 with Steve Price, 1 June, available: http://www.climatechange.gov.au/minister/gregcombet/2011/transcripts/June/tr20110601.aspx [accessed 2 October 2011].Google Scholar
Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (2011) National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: Accounting for the Kyoto Target, December Quarter 2010, April, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
Diesendorf, M. (2011) ‘Redesigning energy systems’ in Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B., Schlosberg, D. (eds.) The Oxford Handboook of Climate Change and Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 561–579.Google Scholar
Ekins, P., Barker, T. (2001) ‘Carbon taxes and carbon emissions trading’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(3), pp. 325–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enevoldsen, M. (2005) The Theory of Environmental Agreements and Taxes: CO2 Policy Performance in Comparative Perspective, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, England.Google Scholar
Fischer, C. (2003) ‘Climate change policy choices and technical innovation’, Minerals and Energy — Raw Materials Report, 18, pp. 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galiana, I., Green, C. (2010) ‘Technology-led climate policy’ in Lomborg, B. (ed.) Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 292–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillard, J. (2011) A great clean energy future, a great reform agenda, Speech to National Press Club, 14 July, available: http://www.sweetspeeches.com/s/2592-julia-eileen-gillard-a-great-clean-energy-future-a-great-reform-agenda [accessed 10 February 2012].Google Scholar
Goulder, L. H. (1995) ‘Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader’s guide’, International Tax and Public Finance, 2(2), pp. 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, M., Azar, C., Persson, U. M. (2005) ‘Allowance allocation in the European emissions trading system: A commentary’, Climate Policy, 5(1), pp. 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, R.W. (2009) ‘Greenhouse gas auctions and taxes: Some political economy considerations’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(2), pp. 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, K. (2010) ‘The comparative politics of carbon taxation’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6, pp. 507–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, J. (2007) ‘Exploring a carbon tax for Australia’, CIS Policy Monograph 80, The Centre for Independent Studies, Sydney, available: http://www.cis.org.au/publications/policy-monographs/article/919-exploring-a-carbon-tax-for-australia [accessed 10 February 2012].Google Scholar
IPCC (2001) International Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2001: Mitigation: Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Insitution, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B., Stavins, R. N. (1995) ‘Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: The effects of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(3), S43–S63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jotzo, F., Betz, R. (2009) ‘Australia’s emissions trading scheme: Opportunities and obstacles for linking’, Climate Policy, 9(4), pp. 402–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, L. (2006) ‘Carbon trading: A critical conversation on climate change, privatisation and power’, Development Dialogue, 48, Dag Hammarskjöld Centre, Uppsala, p. 91.Google Scholar
Löschel, A. (2002) ‘Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: A survey’, Ecological Economics, 43 (2–3), pp. 105–126.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (1991) ‘Evolutionary biology, technological change and economic history’, Bulletin of Economic Research, 43(2), pp. 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R. G. (2010), ‘The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(2), pp. 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, W. E. (1995), ‘Green taxes: Can we protect the environment and improve the tax system at the same time?’, Southern Economic Journal, 61, pp. 915–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2009) Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, The Economics of Climate Change Mitigation: Policies and Options for Global Action Beyond 2012, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (2010) Taxation, Innovation and the Environment, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Parry, I. W. H. (2001) ‘Revenue recycling and the costs of reducing carbon emissions’ in Toman, M. A. (ed.) Climate Change Economics and Policy: An RFF Anthology, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Parry, M., Palutikof, J., Hanson, C., Lowe, J. (2008), ‘Squaring up to reality’, Nature Reports Climate Change, pp. 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, D. W. (1991) ‘The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming’, The Economic Journal, 101, pp. 938–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietsch, J., McAllister, I. (2010) ‘“A diabolical challenge”: Public opinion and climate change policy in Australia’, Environmental Politics, 19(2), pp. 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1920) The Economics of Welfare Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Popp, D. (2002) ‘Induced innovation and energy prices’, American Economic Review, 92(1), pp. 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjærseth, J. B., Wettestad, J. (2008) ‘Implementing EU emissions trading: Success or failure?’, International Environmental Agreements, 8(3), pp. 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spash, C. L. (2002) Greenhouse Economics: Value and Ethics, Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spash, C. L. (2007) ‘The economics of climate change impacts à la Stern: Novel and nuanced or rhetorically restricted?’, Ecological Economics, 63(4), pp. 706–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spash, C. L. (2010) ‘The brave new world of carbon trading’, New Political Economy, 15(2), pp. 169–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, W. (2011) Address to National Press Club, Canberra, 7 June.Google Scholar
The Age (2011) ‘AWU backs Gillard’s carbon tax’, 18 July, available: http://www.theage.com.au/environment/climate-change/awu-backs-gillards-carbon-tax-20110718-1hl2c.html [accessed 1 February 2012].Google Scholar
The Australian (2010) ‘Gillard PM dumps citizens assembly as Labor, Greens strike alliance deal’, 1 September, available: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/labor-greens-strike-alliance-deal-for-stable-government/story-e6frg6n6-1225912672100 [accessed 1 February 2012].Google Scholar
Treasury (2011) Strong Growth, Low Pollution: Modelling A Carbon Price, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
Weyant, J. P. (1998) ‘The costs of carbon emissions reductions’ in Nordhaus, W. D. (ed.) Economics and Policy Issues in Climate Change, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, pp. 191–214.Google Scholar
Whitesell, W. C. (2011) Climate Policy Foundations: Science and Economics with Lessons from Monetary Regulation, Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar