Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:34:24.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The APPM Dispute: The Dinosaur and Turtles vs the ACTU

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Herb Thompson
Herb Thompson*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Murdoch University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article examines the Australian Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. (APPM) dispute which took place in Burnie, Tasmania between March 3 and June 10, 1992. The dispute is placed within the context of major changes in Australian industrial relations, which have been in process since 1986. Management and unions throughout Australia are still experimenting with a variety of industrial weapons to achieve their aims and goals within the parameters of the “Structural Efficiency Principle” and “enterprise bargaining”, constructed in Accords III through VI, from 1986 to the present.

It is argued that the crucial change during the past six years has been the ability of companies to re-establish managerial prerogative through litigation. This has provided management with the power to confront secondary issues and agents of change such as the Accord, the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, Structural Efficiency, Enterprise Bargaining and Restructuring with a new vigour, toughness and effectuality. Increasingly docile, debilitated and legally disabled union officials and workers seem to be coming to the view that a union victory occurs if the company agrees to abide by the law while directing its workforce, and recognises the workers’ right to be represented by a “third party”.

Type
Contemporary Issues
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , December 1992 , pp. 148 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1992

Footnotes

*

Research for this paper took place during outside study leave and travel was funded by Murdoch University.

References

The Age , various issues.Google Scholar
APPM Ltd. (1972) Annual Report, Chairman’s Address. Located in the University of Melbourne Archives (1990) 3rd Accession, Australian Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. Google Scholar
Australian Stock Exchange Ltd. Material, April.Google Scholar
Australian Stock Exchange Ltd. (1970) Annual Report, Chairman W.D. Brookes Address to Shareholder’s Meeting, October 10. Located in the University of Melbourne Archives (1990) 3rd Accession, Australian Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd., Australian Stock Exchange Ltd. Material, April.Google Scholar
The Australian, various issues.Google Scholar
Australian Financial Review, various issues.Google Scholar
Construction, Forestry and Mining Employees Union (CFMEU) Amalgamated News (1992) 2(3), May/June, p. 8.Google Scholar
Garr, A. (1849) Les Guepes, January.Google Scholar
The Mercury, various issues.Google Scholar
The Pulp and Paper Worker, (1992) 2, May.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1950) “Philosophy and Polities”, Unpopular Essays.Google Scholar
Smith, H., Thompson, H., (1987) “Industrial relations and the law: A case study of Robe River”, The Australian Quarterly, 59 (3 & 4), Spring and Summer, pp. 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, H. (1989) “Conflict and the Social Relations of Capitalism”, The Australian Quarterly, 61 (1), Autumn, pp. 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, H., Smith, H. (1987) “The Conflict at Robe Rivet”, Arena, 79, June, pp. 76–91.Google Scholar
The West Australian, May 25, 1992, p. 8.Google Scholar
University of Melbourne Archives (1990) 3rd Accession, Australian Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd., Australian Stock Exchange Ltd. Material, April.Google Scholar
Ulverstone, D.C., (1992) Interview for the SPEC Newsletter, 2, May.Google Scholar