Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T08:30:56.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theatre of Potentiality

On A-Human Excess in Performances by Fabrice Mazliah, Felix Rothenhäusler, and Boris Nikitin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2023

Nikolaus Müller-Schöll
Translated by
Lydia White  and
Matt Cornish
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How can we conceive potentiality as the inherent future in any present as well as in any past? Contemporary examples of a “theatre of potentiality” include works by dancer and choreographer Fabrice Mazliah; director Felix Rothenhäusler; and author, performer, director, and theoretician Boris Nikitin, who all share an interest in a-human excess: of things, words, bodies, and fictions.

Type
Special Issue on Contemporary German Theatre
Information
TDR , Volume 67 , Special Issue 2: Contemporary German Theatre , June 2023 , pp. 32 - 47
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press for Tisch School of the Arts/NYU

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Adorno, Theodor W. (1930) 1997. “Mahagonny.” In Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 17, 114–22. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1951) 2005. Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life. Trans. Jephcott, E.F.N.. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 1992. “Noten zur Geste.” In Postmoderne und Politik, ed. Georg-Lauer, Jutta, 97–107. Tübingen: Edition diskord.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 1993. “Bartleby o della contingenza.” In Bartleby: La formula della creazione, ed. Deleuze, Gilles and Agamben, Giorgio, 43–85. Macerata: Quodlibet.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1984. “L’effet de réel.” In Le bruissement de la langue: Essais critiques IV, 167–74. Paris: Editions du Seuil, Paris 2000.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. (1933) 1985. Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927–1939. Trans. Stoekl, Allan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. (1966) 1998. “What Is Epic Theatre? [First Version].” In Understanding Brecht, trans. Bostock, Anna, 1–13. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Blanchot, Maurice. (1969) 1983. “The Athenaeum.” Studies in Romanticism 22, 2:163–72. Trans. Esch, Deborah and Balfour, Ian. doi.org/10.2307/25600425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, Bertolt. 1929. Aufstieg und Fall der Stadt Mahagonny: Oper in drei Akten/von Brecht; Musik von Kurt Weill. Wien: Universal-Edition.Google Scholar
Buss, Esther. 2016. “Stinkefinger aus der digitalen Zukunft — Ryan Trecartin.” Spex 335. Accessed 5 March 2021. spex.de/stinkefinger-aus-der-digitalen-zukunft-ryan-trecartin/2/Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2002. “What Is Critique? An Essay on Foucault’s Virtue.” In The Political, ed. Ingram, David, 212–28. Blackwell Readings in Continental Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. 1975. Kafka: Pour une littérature mineure. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. (1979) 1997. “One Less Manifesto.” Trans. Eliane dal Molin and Timothy Murray. In Mimesis, Masochism, & Mime: The Politics of Theatricality in Contemporary French Thought, ed. Murray, Timothy, 239–58. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul. 1984. “Aesthetic Formalization: Kleist’s Über das Marionettentheater .” In The Rhetoric of Romanticism, 263–90. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, Georges. 2017. “‘Puissance de ne pas,’ ou la politique du désoeuvrement.” Critique 836–37:14–30.10.3917/criti.836.0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. (1978) 1997. “What Is Critique?” In The Politics of Truth, ed. Lotringer, Sylvère, trans. Lysa Hochroth and Catherine Porter, 23–82. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. (1926) 1996. Being and Time: A Translation of Sein und Zeit. Trans. Stambaugh, Joan. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. (1931) 1995. Aristotle’s Metaphysics Θ 1–3: On the Essence and Actuality of Force. Trans. Brogan, Walter and Warnek, Peter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Carol. 1975. “The Monstrosity of Translation.” MLN 90, 6:755–66. doi.org/10.2307/2907018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. (1844) 1974. “Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie. Einleitung.” In Staatstheorie: Materialien zur Rekonstruktion der marxistischen Staatstheorie, by Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, ed. Hennig, Eike, 93–108. Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar
Müller-Schöll, Nikolaus. 2007a. “Denken auf der Bühne. Derrida, Forsythe, Chétouane.” In Mnema: Derrida zum Andenken, ed. Georg Christoph Tholen and Hans-Joachim Lenger, 187–208. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Schöll, Nikolaus. 2007b. “(Un-)Glauben. Das Spiel mit der Illusion.” Forum Modernes Theatre 22, 2:141–51.Google Scholar
Müller-Schöll, Nikolaus. 2013. “(Dis-)Belief. In search of a lost reality or playing with illusion.” In Monsters of Reality, ed. Forberg, Siri and Frandsen, Miriam, 99–118. Copenhagen: The Danish National School of Performing Arts – Continuing Education.Google Scholar
Müller-Schöll, Nikolaus. 2014. “Poverty of Experience: Performance Practices After the Fall.” In The Idea of the Avant Garde: And What it Means Today, ed. Marc James Léger, 75–79. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Müller-Schöll, Nikolaus. 2017. “Post Traumatic Theatre. Narrative Performances following catastrophes and the question of the Other.” The Arab Journal of Performance Studies 4 (May):23–37.Google Scholar
Müller-Schöll, Nikolaus. 2018. “Das Problem und Potential des Singulären. Theaterforschung als kritische Wissenschaft.” In Episteme des Theaters: Aktuelle Kontexte von Wissenschaft, Kunst und Öffentlichkeit, ed. Cairo, Milena, Hannemann, Moritz, Haß, Ulrike, Schäfer, Judith, and Wessels, Sarah, 139–50. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Müller-Schöll, Nikolaus. 2019. “Über Theater überhaupt und das Theater des Menschen. Benjamin, Brecht, Derrida, Le Roy.” In Das Denken der Bühne: Szenen zwischen Theater und Philosophie, ed. Müller-Schöll, Nikolaus and Gabriel, Leon, 59–80. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence, 271–313. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Samuel. 1987. Institution and Interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Samuel. 2021. Singularity: Politics and Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

TDReadings

Goss, Lindsay. 2021. “Ending and Excess: Theatre as Being-in-Crisis.” TDR 65, 4 (T252):51–66. doi.org/10.1017/S1054204321000538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Hans-Thies. 1999. “Newness and Pleasure: Mahagonny Songs.” TDR 43, 4 (T164):16–26. doi.org/10.1162/105420499760263462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar