Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:22:11.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Are We Waiting For?

Rehearsal as Arousal Politics in oncogrrrls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2022

Caro Novella
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Current debates in the field of socially engaged art dwell on the relational versus antagonist potentiality of performance for social change, while disability scholars and cancer activists call for performance that activates relationalities beyond individual/medical models. oncogrrrls proposes rehearsal as a liquid space for the joint creation of new cancer relations.

Type
Article
Information
TDR , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 101 - 114
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for Tisch School of the Arts/NYU

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bakkali, De Houda. 2014. “Día Mundial Contra el Cáncer 2014 | ‘El cáncer es un paréntesis, hay vida después del cáncer. Esa es la actitud que se debe tener.’” Comunicación, salud y sostenibilidad, 5 February. Accessed 15 January 2022. https://hbakkali.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/dia-mundial-contra-el-cancer-2014-el-cancer-es-un-parentesis-hay-vida-despues-del-cancer-esa-es-la-actitud-que-se-debe-tener/.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2012. “On Touching—the Inhuman That Therefore I Am.” Differences 23, 3:206–23. doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1892943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Boal, Augusto. (1974) 2000. Theater of the Oppressed. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Bueso, José M. 2016. “The Play’s the Thing.” In Putting Rehearsals to the Test: Practices of Rehearsal in Fine Arts, Film, Theater, Theory, and Politics, eds. Buchmann, Sabeth, Lafer, Ilse , and Ruhm, Constanze, 108–19. Academy of Fine Arts Vienna 19. Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Mel Y. 2012. Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Clare, Eli. (1999) 2015. Exile and Pride: Disability, Queerness, and Liberation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Clare, Eli. 2017. Brilliant Imperfection: Grappling with Cure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2010. Smile or Die: How Positive Thinking Fooled America and the World. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo. (1970) 2014. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 30th Anniversary Edition. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Greco, Cinzia. 2019. “Moving for Cures: Breast Cancer and Mobility in Italy.” Medical Anthropology 38, 4:384–98. doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2019.1592171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, Lynette. 2019. Politics of Practice: A Rhetoric of Performativity. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irueta, Ainhoa. 2013. Personal communication with author.Google Scholar
Jackson, Shannon. 2011. Social Works: Performing Art, Supporting Publics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, Lochlann S. 2007. “Cancer Butch.” Cultural Anthropology 22, 4:501–38. doi.org/10.1525/can.2007.22.4.501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, S. Lochlann. 2013. Malignant: How Cancer Becomes Us. First edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Klawiter, Maren. 2004. “Breast Cancer in Two Regimes: The Impact of Social Movements on Illness Experience.” Sociology of Health & Illness 26, 6:845–74. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.421_1.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuppers, Petra, ed. 2011. Somatic Engagement. New York: ChainLinks Press.Google Scholar
Lobel, Brian. 2019. Theatre and Cancer. London: Red Globe Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1981. “The Uses of Anger.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 9, 3:7–10.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984. “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House.” Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Matarasso, François. 2019. Uma Arte Irrequieta: Reflexões sobre o triunfo e importância da prática participativa (A Restless Art: How Participation Won and Why It Matters). Lisbon: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
McRuer, Robert. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novella, Caro. 2018. “Arousing Formlessness: Collaborative Encounters with Chemotherapy.” Performance Research 22, 6:54–56 doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2017.1414405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novella, Caro. 2021. “onCocreation. Rehearsing Cancer Ecologies; Sensuous Experiments for Joint Mutation in Cancer Art/Activism.” PhD diss., University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Kevin. 2019. “Scores as Practice: Scoring as Method.” Revista Corpo-Grafías: Estudios Críticos de y Desde Los Cuerpos 6, 6: 108–21. doi.org/10.14483/25909398.14231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
oncogrrrls. 2013. “(Parèntesi).” oncogrrrls, 6 August. https://oncogrrrls.art/2013/08/06/parentesi/.Google Scholar
Paituví, Marissa. 2019. Personal correspondence with author, 12 October.Google Scholar
Porroche-Escudero, Ana, Coll-Planas, Gerard, and Riba-Sanmarti, Caterina. 2017. Cicatrices (In)Visibles: Perspectivas Feministas sobre el cáncer de mama . 1st Edición. Barcelona: Edicions Bellaterra.Google Scholar
Price, Margaret. 2015. “The Bodymind Problem and the Possibilities of Pain.” Hypatia 30, 1:268–84. doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puar, Jasbir K. 2009. “Prognosis Time: Towards a Geopolitics of Affect, Debility and Capacity.” Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 19, 2: 161–72. doi.org/10.1080/07407700903034147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalk, Sami. 2018. Bodyminds Reimagined: (Dis)Ability, Race, and Gender in Black Women’s Speculative Fiction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shildrick, Margrit. 2009. Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simoniti, Vid. 2018. “Assessing Socially Engaged Art.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76, 1:71–82. doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanier, Bonnie. 2001. “‘Your Silence Will Not Protect You’: Feminist Science Studies, Breast Cancer, and Activism.” In Feminist Science Studies: A New Generation, ed. Mayberry, Maralee, Banu Subramaniam, Lisa H. Weasel, 230–47. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sulik, Gayle A. (2010) 2012. Pink Ribbon Blues: How Breast Canser Culture Undermines Women’s Health. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Valls-Llobet, Carme. 2017. “The Science of Difference: The Invisibility of Women in Health Sciences.” Metode Science Studies Journal 7:121–25. doi.org/10.7203/metode.7.8155.Google Scholar
Zarrilli, Phillip. 2019. (Toward) a Phenomenology of Acting. 1st ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

TDReadings

Kuppers, Petra. 2008. “Tiresian Journeys.” TDR 52, 4 (T200):174–82. doi.org/10.1162/dram.2008.52.4.174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Coleman. 2012. “Cancer Previval and the Theatrical Fact.” TDR 56, 4 (T216):104–20. doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Catherine, David Leventhal, Leah Apple, Kostro, Katrina, Sudler, Andrew, and Charon, Rita. 2020. “Observing the World as Dancers Do: Teaching Dance to Medical Students.” TDR 64, 3 (T247):67–78. doi.org/10.1162/dram_a_00943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar