Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:18:11.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mise au Centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2021

Extract

If one could represent in space the vision of a Zen garden, it would be the Arizona desert. But one cannot represent in space the vision of a Zen garden. Thus, the Arizona desert is neither a Zen garden nor the vision one could have of it.

Within the last 10 years, many directors of “gestural theatre” have attempted to dispense with the author. As a result, the theatre is used as a vehicle for conveying a “message.” That is the job of newspapers, theses, political speeches, and this very text. But art finds its essence only in the ambivalence of all things and their signs, in their unfathomable ambiguity.

Some directors rely on classical culture. We expect from a true creator an exploration of the unknown that opens up into the infinite, not a rehashing of mummified mythologies.

Directors appear unwilling to accept their dependence upon the author, who is bound by everything written before his time, by the state of the language in his time.

Type
Two Pieces
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 The Drama Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)