Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:54:47.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services outcomes for people with learning disabilities: national data 2012–2013 to 2019–2020

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2022

Dave Dagnan*
Affiliation:
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Community Learning Disability Services, Unit 9, Lillyhall Business Centre, Jubilee Road, Lillyhall, Workington CA14 4HA, UK
Caroline Rodhouse
Affiliation:
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Community Learning Disability Services, Unit 9, Lillyhall Business Centre, Jubilee Road, Lillyhall, Workington CA14 4HA, UK
Richard Thwaites
Affiliation:
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, First Step, UK
Chris Hatton
Affiliation:
Department of Social Care & Social Work, Faculty of Health, Psychology & Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Brooks Building, 53 Bonsall Street, Manchester M15 6GX, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Primary care interventions for people with common mental health problems in England are primarily delivered through Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services. One of the priorities for IAPT services is to reduce inequalities in access and outcomes for potentially disadvantaged populations. This paper uses national data from the years 2012–2013 to 2019–2020 to present a comparison of service process and therapy outcomes for people with learning disabilities. Annual data for people with learning disabilities, people with other recorded disabilities and people with no recorded disabilities were extracted from a publicly available, national data source. Data are presented graphically with relative risk calculated for each variable and year, and show a broadly similar pattern of waiting time access for people with learning disabilities and people with no disabilities, and a broadly similar proportion of people with learning disabilities and people with no disabilities who finish treatment. However, people with learning disabilities have poorer clinical outcomes than people with no disabilities. We discuss adaptations to IAPT processes and therapy provision that may further support people with learning disabilities’ access to IAPT services.

Key learning aims

  1. (1) To describe how IAPT services record disabilities, and in particular record whether a person identifies themselves as having a learning disability.1

  2. (2) To explore the differences in processes and therapy outcomes for people with learning disabilities compared with people with no disabilities and people with other disabilities.

  3. (3) To understand adaptations to IAPT processes and therapies that may make IAPT services more accessible to people with learning disabilities.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further reading

Dagnan, D. (2018). Adapting LICBT for people with learning disabilities. In Papworth, M., & Marrinan, T (eds), Low Intensity Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Dagnan, D., Burke, C. K., Davies, J., & Chinn, D. (2015a). Learning Disabilities: Positive Practice Guide. Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT). Foundation for People with Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar

References

Beck, A., Naz, S., Brooks, M., & Jankowska, M. (2019). IAPT Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Service User Positive Practice Guide. https://babcp.com/Therapists/BAME-Positive-Practice-Guide-PDF Google Scholar
Boothroyd, L., Dagnan, D., & Muncer, S. (2018). Psychometric analysis of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire using Mokken scaling and confirmatory factor analysis. Health and Primary Care, 2, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, D., & Abraham, E. (2016). Using ‘candidacy’ as a framework for understanding access to mainstream psychological treatment for people with intellectual disabilities and common mental health problems within the English Improving Access to Psychological Therapies service. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research, 60, 571582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, D. M. (2011). Implementing NICE guidelines for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety disorders: the IAPT experience. International Review of Psychiatry, 23, 318327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, S. A., Smiley, E., Morrison, J., Williamson, A., & Allan, L. (2007). An epidemiological investigation of affective disorders with a population-based cohort of 1023 adults with intellectual disabilities. Psychological Medicine, 37, 873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dagnan, D. (2018). Adapting LICBT for people with learning disabilities. In Papworth, M., & Marrinan, T (eds), Low Intensity Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Dagnan, D., Burke, C. K., Davies, J., & Chinn, D. (2015a). Learning Disabilities: Positive Practice Guide. Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT). Foundation for People with Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
Dagnan, D., Masson, J., Cavagin, A., Thwaites, R., & Hatton, C. (2015b). The development of a measure of confidence in delivering therapy to people with intellectual disabilities. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 22, 392398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dagnan, D., Masson, J., Thwaites, R., James, A., & Hatton, C. (2018). Training therapists to work with people with intellectual disabilities in Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31, 760767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Work and Pensions ( 2021). Family Resources Survey: Financial Year 2019 to 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/family-resources-survey-financial-year-2019-to-2020/family-resources-survey-financial-year-2019-to-2020 (accessed 2 May 2021).Google Scholar
Dodd, K., Burke, C., Gibson, A., Hines, E., Howarth, P., Jennison, J., Mackintosh, R., Radcliffe, A., Vieira, F. & Unsworth, G. (2017). Improving Access to Psychological Therapies for people with intellectual disabilities – role of a reference group in achieving change. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 11, 173186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahoda, A., Hastings, R., Hatton, C., Cooper, S. A., Dagnan, D., Zhang, R., … & Melville, C. (2017). Comparison of behavioural activation with guided self-help for treatment of depression in adults with intellectual disabilities: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 4, 909919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. In Kazdin, A. E. (ed), Methodological Issues & Strategies in Clinical Research (pp. 631648). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10109-042 Google Scholar
Marwood, H., Chinn, D., Gannon, K., & Scior, K. (2018). The experiences of high intensity therapists delivering cognitive behavioural therapy to people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31, 7686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (2020). The Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Manual . https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/iapt-manual-v4.pdf Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016). Mental Health Problems in People with Learning Disabilities: Prevention, Assessment and Management (NG54). NICE Guideline 54. nice.org.uk/guidance/ng54.Google Scholar
Digital, NHS (2020). Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) Disease Prevalence and Care Quality Achievement Rates. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-tools-and-services/data-services/general-practice-data-hub/quality-outcomes-framework-qof (accessed 2 May 2021).Google Scholar
NHS Digital (2021b). NHS Data Model and Dictionary. https://datadictionary.nhs.uk/attributes/disability_code.html (accessed 8 May 2021).Google Scholar
Digital, NHS (2021c). Psychological Therapies, Reports on the Use of IAPT Services. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/psychological-therapies-report-on-the-use-of-iapt-services (accessed 3 February 2021).Google Scholar
Public Health England ( 2016). People with Learning Disabilities in England 2015, www.gov.uk/government/publications/people-with-learning-disabilities-in-england-2015 (accessed 2 May 2021).Google Scholar
Salmon, B., Gibson, S., Nagel, B., Roscoe, S., Vidalaki, V., & Ubhi, H. (2013). Offering IAPT to people with learning disabilities: partnership working and an innovative approach. Clinical Psychology Forum, 252, 4044.Google Scholar
Shankland, J. & Dagnan, D. (2015) A survey of IAPT therapists’ attitudes to working with people with intellectual disabilities. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 206214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surley, L., & Dagnan, D. (2019). A review of the frequency and nature of adaptations to cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32, 219237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.