Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:49:19.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Callback’: increasing access to, and improving choice in, a multi-level, multi-purpose low-intensity service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2013

Jim White ,
Michael Ross ,
Carol Richards ,
Vicky Manson  and
Sandra Johnston
Jim White*
Affiliation:
STEPS Primary Care Mental Health Team, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS, Glasgow, UK
Michael Ross
Affiliation:
STEPS Primary Care Mental Health Team, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS, Glasgow, UK
Carol Richards
Affiliation:
STEPS Primary Care Mental Health Team, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS, Glasgow, UK
Vicky Manson
Affiliation:
STEPS Primary Care Mental Health Team, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS, Glasgow, UK
Sandra Johnston
Affiliation:
STEPS Primary Care Mental Health Team, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS, Glasgow, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr J. White, STEPS Primary Care Mental Health Team, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS, 60 Florence St, Glasgow G5 0YX, UK (email: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a previous paper auditing individual therapy in the STEPS team, we demonstrated a significant problem with attrition for both CBT and person-centred therapy. We argued that a root-and-branch change to the referral process was needed. This paper looks at the system which replaced it. ‘Callback’ allows self-referral with service users able to leave a phone message at any time. Clinicians call back and carry out a protocol-driven assessment, arranging, where appropriate, services at the end of the call. Reporting on the first 2500 calls, 92% of callers were successfully called back. Individuals were, on average, called back in 8.4 hours. Eighty-six percent of callers were offered an intervention within the STEPS service. They entered these STEPS services, on average, 9.4 days after the initial phone call. Of all callers 15.6% were offered individual therapy. Of these, 93% attended the first appointment and 82% completed a course of treatment. The results suggest that Callback is a significant improvement on the GP-referral system it replaced and provide evidence supporting the utility of ‘multi-level, multi-purpose’ services in primary care.

Keywords

AdultsanxietyCBTdepressionmixed anxiety-depression disorder
Type
Practice article
Information
the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 124 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bee, PE, Lovell, K, Lidbetter, N, Easton N, Gask L (2010). You can't get anything perfect: user perspectives on the delivery of cognitive-behavioural therapy by telephone. Social Science and Medicine 71, 1308–1315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett-Levy, J, Richards, DA, Farrand, P, Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Kavanagh DJ, Klein B, Lau MA, Proudfoot J, Ritterband L, White J, Williams C (2010). Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bower, P, Gilbody, S (2005). Stepped care in psychological therapies: access, effectiveness and efficiency. British Journal of Psychiatry 186, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broomfield, NM, Birch, L (2009). Primary care mental health teams: where are all the older people? Clinical Psychology Forum 198, 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J, Barkham, M (2007). CORE-10 User Manual, version 1.1. CORE System Trust & CORE Information Management Systems Ltd.Google Scholar
Das-Munshi, J, Goldberg, D, Bebbington, PE, Bhugra DK, Brugha TS, Dewey ME, Jenkins R, Stewart R, Prince M (2008). Public health significance of mixed anxiety and depression: beyond current classification. British Journal of Psychiatry 192, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flesch, R (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology 32, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GCPH (2008). A community health and wellbeing profile for south-east Glasgow (www.gcph.co.uk/communityprofiles). Glasgow Centre for Population Health.Google Scholar
Grant, K, McMeekin, E, Jamieson, R, Fairful, A, Miller, C, White, J (2012). Attrition rates in a low-intensity service: a comparison of CBT and PCT and the impact of deprivation. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 40, 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, K, McMeekin, E, White, J (2010). An evaluation of individuals’ experiences of attending a low intensity advice clinic in primary care. Clinical Psychology Forum 208, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P, Bright, JA (1997). Stigma and mental illness. Journal of Mental Health 6, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAPT (2012). IAPT three year report: the first million patients. Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (www.iapt.nhs.uk/iapt).Google Scholar
Lovell, K (2010). Supporting low intensity interventions using the telephone. In: Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions (ed. Bennett-Levy, J., Christensen, H., Farrand, P.et al.,), pp. 275–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, K, Cox, D, Haddock, G, Jones, C, Raines, D, Garvey, R, Roberts, C, Hadley, S (2006). Telephone administered cognitive behaviour therapy for treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. British Medical Journal 333, 883–887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovell, K, Richards, D (2000). Multiple Access Points and Levels (MAPLE): ensuring choice, accessibility and equity for CBT services. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 28, 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludman, E, Gregory, S, Tutty, S, Von Korff, M (2007). A randomized trial of telephone psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for depression: continuation and durability of effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 75, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzer, H, Singleton, N, Lee, A (2002). The social and economic consequences of adults with mental disorders. London: ONS.Google Scholar
Mohr, D, Likosky, W, Bertagnolli, A, Goodkin, DE, Van Der, WJ, Dwyer, P (2000). Telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy for the treatment of depressive symptoms in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68, 356–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, D, Lovell, K, Gilbody, S, Gask, L, Torgerson, D, Barkham, M, Bland, M, Bower, P, Lankshear, AJ, Simpson, A, Fletcher, J, Escott, D, Hennessey, S, Richardson, R (2007). Collaborative care for depression in UK primary care: a randomised controlled trial. Psychological Medicine 38, 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, DA, Borglin G, (2011). Implementation of psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in routine practice: two year prospective cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorders 133, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scottish Executive (2006). Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006 General Report. Scottish Executive National Statistics Publication.Google Scholar
White, J (2008). CBT and the challenge of primary care: developing effective, efficient, equitable, acceptable and accessible services for common mental health problems. Journal of Public Mental Health 7, 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J (2009). www.glasgowsteps.com: a low-intensity intervention in primary care. Clinical Psy-chology Forum 204, 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J (2010 a). The STEPS model: a high volume, multi-level, multi-purpose approach to address common mental health problems. In: Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions (ed. Bennett-Levy, J., Christensen, H., Farrand, P.et al.,), pp. 35–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, J (2010 b). Large group didactic CBT for common mental health problems. In: Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions (ed. Bennett-Levy, J., Christensen, H., Farrand, P.et al.,), pp. 313–322. Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J (2010 c). The advice clinic or what I did in my thirty minutes. In: Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions (ed. Bennett-Levy, J., Christensen, H., Farrand, P.et al.,), pp. 339–346. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J (2010 d). Bringing the public on board: health promotion and social marketing in deprived communities. In: Oxford Guide to Low Intensity CBT Interventions (ed. Bennett-Levy, J., Christensen, H., Farrand, P.et al.,), pp. 541–550. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, J, Joice, A, Petrie, S, Johnston, S, Gilroy, D, Hutton, P, Hynes, N (2008). STEPS: going beyond the tip of the iceberg. A multi-level, multi-purpose approach to common mental health problems. Journal of Public Mental Health 7, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.