Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:05:42.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An implementation pilot of the MindBalance web-based intervention for depression in three IAPT services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2014

Cecily Morrison ,
Graham Walker ,
Kai Ruggeri  and
Jamie Hacker Hughes
Cecily Morrison
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Engineering Department, Cambridge, UK
Graham Walker*
Affiliation:
NHS Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Foundation Trust, Mid Essex IAPT, Heybridge, Maldon, Essex, UK
Kai Ruggeri
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Engineering Department, Cambridge, UK
Jamie Hacker Hughes
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford Campus, Chelmsford, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: Mr G. Walker, NHS Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Foundation Trust, Mid Essex IAPT, ICS Triplex House, Heybridge, Maldon, Essex, CM9 4LA, UK (email: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Web-based interventions for depression have burgeoned over the past 10 years as researchers and health professionals aim to harness the reach and cost-effectiveness that the internet promises. Despite strong clinical evidence of their effectiveness and policy support, web-based interventions have not become widely used in practice. We explored this translation gap by conducting an implementation pilot of MindBalance, a web-based intervention for depression built on the SilverCloud platform, in three IAPT services. We posed three questions: (1) Who chooses to use MindBalance? (2) Is MindBalance effective for these clients? (3) How do clients use MindBalance? Our results for questions (1) and (2) are commensurate with the positive findings in the literature on patient acceptability and clinical effectiveness for such interventions. Client usage, captured in adherence data as well as usage case-studies, was diverse and differed markedly from face-to-face sessions. The most surprising result, however, concerned the small number of people who were offered the intervention. We reflect upon why this was and discuss implementation issues that primary mental health services should consider when adding a web-based intervention to their services.

Keywords

Computerized CBTdepressionIAPTweb-based intervention
Type
Practice article
Information
the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist , Volume 7 , December 2014 , e15
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Follow-up reading

e-hub (http://www.ehub.anu.edu.au/). e-hub is an initiative of the ANU Centre for Mental Health Research. e-hub develops and evaluates websites that deliver psycho-education and psychological interventions for common mental health problems, as well as clinical and consumer networking.Google Scholar
Kaltenthaler, E, Parry, G, Beverley, C, Ferriter, M (2008). Computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression: systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry 193, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharry, J, Davidson, R, McLoughlin, O, Doherty, G (2013). A service-based evaluation of a therapist-supported online cognitive behavioral therapy program for depression. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15, e121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Andersson, G (2010). The promise and pitfalls of the internet for cognitive behavioral therapy. BMC Medicine 8, 82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersson, G, Cuijpers, P (2009). Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 38, 196–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barak, A, Klein, B, Proudfoot, JG (2009). Defining internet-supported therapeutic interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 38, 4–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A, Steer, R, Carbin, M (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review 8, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, A, Ward, C, Mendelson, M, Mock, J, Erbaugh, J (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 4, 561–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, H, Griffiths, KM, Farrer, L (2009). Adherence in Internet interventions for anxiety and depression: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 11, e13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, H, Griffiths, KM, Jorm, AF (2004). Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition) 328, 265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, H, Griffiths, KM, Mackinnon, AJ, Brittliffe, K (2006). Online randomized controlled trial of brief and full cognitive behaviour therapy for depression. Psychological Medicine 36, 1737–1746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooksey, D (2006). A review of UK health research funding [the Cooksey Review]. Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar
Danaher, BG, Seeley, JR (2009). Methodological issues in research on web-based behavioral interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 38, 28–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donkin, L, Christensen, H, Naismith, SL, Neal, B, Hickie, IB, Glozier, N (2011). A systematic review of the impact of adherence on the effectiveness of e-therapies. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13, e52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, C, Margison, F, Barkham, M (1998). The contribution of reliable and clinically significant change methods to evidence-based mental health. Evidence Based Mental Health 1, 70–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foroushani, PS, Schneider, J, Assareh, N (2011). Meta-review of the effectiveness of computerised CBT in treating depression. BMC Psychiatry 11, 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbody, S, Richards, D, Barkham, M (2007). Diagnosing depression in primary care using self-completed instruments: UK validation of PHQ-9 and CORE-OM. British Journal of General Practice 57, 650–652.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaltenthaler, E, Parry, G, Beverley, C, Ferriter, M (2008 a). Computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression: systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry 193, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaltenthaler, E, Sutcliffe, P, Parry, G, Beverley, C, Rees, A, Ferriter, M (2008 b). The acceptability to patients of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine 38, 1521–1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Layard, R (2006). The case for psychological treatment centres. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition) 332, 1030–1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohr, DC, Siddique, J, Ho, J, Duffecy, J, Jin, L, Fokuo, JK (2010). Interest in behavioral and psychological treatments delivered face-to-face, by telephone, and by internet. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 40, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mundt, JC (2002). The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. British Journal of Psychiatry 180, 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health (2011). No health without mental health: a cross government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Parry, G, Barkham, M, Brazier, J, Dent, K, Hardy, G, Kendrick, T, Rick, J, Chambers, E, Chan, T, Connell, J, Hutten, R, De, S, Mukuria, C, Saxon, D, Bower, P (2011). An evaluation of a new service model: Improving Access to Psychological Therapies demonstration sites 2006–2009. SDO Report (June).Google Scholar
Peters, DH, Adam, T, Alonge, O, Agyepong, IA, Tran, N (2013). Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. British Medical Journal 347, f6753.Google ScholarPubMed
Proudfoot, J, Ryden, C, Everitt, B, Shapiro, DA, Goldberg, D, Mann, A, Tylee, A, Marks, I, Gray, JA (2004). Clinical efficacy of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 185, 46–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resnicow, K, Strecher, V, Couper, M, Chua, H, Little, R, Nair, V, Polk, TA, Atienza, AA (2010). Methodologic and design issues in patient-centered e-health research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 38, 98–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritterband, LM, Cox, DJ, Gordon, TL, Borowitz, SM, Kovatchev, BP, Walker, LS, Sutphen, JL (2006). Examining the added value of audio, graphics, and interactivity in an internet intervention for pediatric encopresis. Children's Health Care 35, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggeri, K, Farrington, C, Brayne, C (2013). A global model for effective use and evaluation of e-learning in health. Telemedicine and E-Health 19, 312–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharry, J, Davidson, R, McLoughlin, O, Doherty, G (2013). A service-based evaluation of a therapist-supported online cognitive behavioral therapy program for depression. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15, e121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spek, V, Cuijpers, P, Nyklícek, I, Riper, H, Keyzer, J, Pop, V (2007). Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine 37, 319–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waller, G (2009). Evidence-based treatment and therapist drift. Behaviour Research and Therapy 47, 119–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waller, R, Gilbody, S (2009). Barriers to the uptake of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. Psychological Medicine 39, 705–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, G, Williams, CJ (2004). If the evidence is so good – why doesn't anyone use them? A national survey of the use of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 32, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.