Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-68cz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-16T11:13:55.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Was Insanity Increasing? a Response to Edward Hare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Andrew Scull
Andrew Scull*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the central paradoxes of the Victorian reforms in the treatment of the mentally ill was the curious fact that the “scientific” discovery of mental illness and the adoption of a more rational approach based on this discovery—an approach which aimed at treating and curing the lunatic, rather than neglecting him or incarcerating him in a gaol or workhouse—were associated with an explosive growth in the number of insane people. Edward Hare's recent Maudsley Lecture raises again the interesting question of whether or not this reflects a true increase in the incidence of mental illness in nineteenth century England. As he correctly notes, the aggregate data collected at the time do not allow a “decisive answer”, but I am pleased that his reassessment of the probabilities led him to endorse my prior conclusion that its incidence was indeed increasing. (Scull, 1979).

Type
Discussion
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 144 , Issue 4 , April 1984 , pp. 432 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arlidge, J. T. (1859) On the Slate of Lunacy and the Legal Provision for the Insane. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Barton, R. (1965) Institutional Neurosis 2nd edition. Bristol: Wright.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T. (1962) The reliability of psychiatric diagnosis: 1. A critique of systematic studies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 119, 210–16.Google Scholar
Belknap, I. (1956) Human Problems of a State Mental Hospital. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Browne, W. A. F. (1837) What Asylums Were, Are, and Ought to Be. Edinburgh: Black.Google Scholar
Bucknill, J. C. (1880) The Care of the Insane and their Legal Control. London: Macmillan. Caterham Lunatic Asylum Annual Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, L. J. & Chapman, J. P. (1969) Illusory correlations as an obstacle to the use of valid psycho-diagnosis signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 271–80.Google Scholar
Commissioners in Lunacy Annual Reports to the Lord Chancellor.Google Scholar
Fox, R. W. (1978) So Far Disordered in Mind. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. (1970) Profession of Medicine: A Study in the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Granville, J. M. (1877) The Care and Cure of the Insane 2 Vols. London: Hardewicke and Bogue.Google Scholar
Hanwell (Middlesex) County Lunatic Asylum Annual Reports.Google Scholar
Hare, E. (1983) Was insanity on the increase? British Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 439–55.Google Scholar
Haslam, J. (1809) Observations on Madness and Melancholy. 2nd edition. London: Callow.Google Scholar
House of Commons (1877) Report of the Select Committee on the Operation of the Lunacy Law. London.Google Scholar
Littlemore (Oxfordshire) County Lunatic Asylum Annual Reports.Google Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1867) The Physiology and Pathology of Mind. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1877) The alleged increase of insanity. Journal of Mental Science, 23, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, T. (1854) Medical Testimony and Evidence in Cases of Lunacy. London: Parker.Google Scholar
Monro, H. (1850) Remarks on Insanity, Its Nature and Treatment. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. (1982) A preference for liberty: The case against involuntary commitment of the mentally disordered. In The Court of Last Resort: Mental Illness and the Law (ed. Warren, C. A. B.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Northampton General Lunatic Asylum Annual Reports.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1984) The Theory and Practice of Civil Commitment. University of Michigan Law Review. (Winter). In press.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1979) Museums of Madness. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1981) Trial by Medicine: Insanity and Responsibility in Victorian Trials. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L. & Fleiss, J. (1974) A re-analysis of the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 341–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanton, A. H. & Schwartz, M. S. (1954) The Mental Hospital: A Study of Institutional Participation in Psychiatric Illness and Treatment. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. K. (1962) Institutionalism in mental hospitals. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychiatry, 1, 38.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. & Brown, G. W. (1970) Institutionalism and Schizophrenia. Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.