Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:01:45.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Usefulness of the Clinical Tests of the Sensorium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

John Hinton  and
Eileen Withers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although the clinical tests of sensorium (CTS) are widely used as a quick check of mental efficiency (Slater and Roth, 1969), they have come together in a haphazard way and their validity has been questioned (Shapiro et al., 1956). For example, a patient may be able to perform well on so-called memory tests such as Digit Span and Babcock Sentence and still have a florid memory disturbance (Roth and Hopkins, 1953; Zangwill, 1946).

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 119 , Issue 548 , July 1971 , pp. 9 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1971 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, H. (1930). ‘An experiment in the measurement of mental deterioration.’ Archives of Psychology, 117.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E. (1924). Textbook of Psychiatry. New York.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., and Halstead, H. (1945). ‘The memory function. A factorial study of fifteen clinical tests.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 102, 174–80.Google Scholar
Halstead, H. (1943). ‘A psychometric study of senility.’ Journal of Mental Science, 89, 363–73.Google Scholar
Hayman, M. (1941). ‘The use of serial sevens in psychiatric examination.’ American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 11, 341–55.Google Scholar
Heilbrun, A. B. (1958). ‘The digit span test and the prediction of cerebral pathology.’ Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 80, 228–31.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. K., and Gillespie, R. D. (1927). Textbook of Psychiatry. London.Google Scholar
Hopkins, B., and Roth, M. (1953). ‘Psychological test performance in patients over sixty. I. Senile psychosis and the affective disorders of old age.’ Journal of Mental Science, 99, 439–50.Google Scholar
Ingham, J. G. (1952). ‘Memory and Intelligence.’ British Journal of Psychology, 43, 20–31.Google Scholar
Ingle, J. (1957). ‘An experimental study of learning and memory function in elderly psychiatric patients.’ Journal of Mental Science, 102, 233–46.Google Scholar
Inglis, J. (1970). ‘Memory disorder.’ In Symptoms of Psychopathology. (ed. Costello), New York. 95–134.Google Scholar
Moroney, M. J. (1951). Facts from Figures. Harmonds-worth. Pelican Books.Google Scholar
Roth, M., and Hopkins, B. (1953). ‘Psychological test performance in patients over sixty. II. Paraphrenia, arteriosclerotic psychosis and acute confusion.’ Journal of Mental Science, 99, 451–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruesch, J. (1944). ‘Intellectual impairment in head injuries.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 100, 480–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, M. B., Post, F., Lofvtng, B., and Inolis, J. (1956). ‘Memory function in psychiatric patients over sixty: some methodological and diagnostic implications.’ Journal of Mental Science, 102, 233–46.Google Scholar
Slater, E., and Roth, M. (1969). Clinical Psychiatry. London.Google Scholar
Warburton, J. W. (1963). ‘The Babcock sentence in clinical practice.’ British Journal of Medical Psychology, 36, 351–3.Google Scholar
Withers, E., and Hinton, J. M. (1971). British Journal of Psychiatry, 119, 1–8.Google Scholar
Zangwill, O. L. (1943). ‘Clinical tests of memory impairment.’ Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 36, 576–80.Google Scholar
Zangwill, O. L. (1946). ‘Some qualitative observations on verbal memory in cases of cerebral lesions.’ British Journal of Psychology, 37, 8–19.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.