Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:29:55.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Typology of Sub-Clinical Senescent Cognitive Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Karen Ritchie
Affiliation:
INSERM Equipe “Vieillissement cognitif”, CRLC Val d'Aurelle, Parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier Cedex 5. Fax: (33) 67613047
Didier Leibovici
Affiliation:
INSERM Equipe “Vieillissement cognitif”, CRLC Val d'Aurelle, Parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier Cedex 5. Fax: (33) 67613047
Bernard Ledésert
Affiliation:
INSERM Equipe “Vieillissement cognitif”, CRLC Val d'Aurelle, Parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier Cedex 5. Fax: (33) 67613047
Jacques Touchon
Affiliation:
INSERM Equipe “Vieillissement cognitif”, CRLC Val d'Aurelle, Parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier Cedex 5. Fax: (33) 67613047

Abstract

Background

Cognitive impairment without dementia is commonly observed in ageing populations. The present study aims to describe types of impairment and evolution over a one-year period.

Method

Three hundred and ninety-seven normal French elderly persons demonstrating recent, observable change in cognitive performance were examined annually using a computerised cognitive examination.

Results

Five subtypes were differentiated by cluster analysis. Two of the groups were predicted by logistic regression to be at high risk of senile dementia. Of 16 incident cases of senile dementia diagnosed in the following year, 13 were found to have derived from these two groups. The typology was also found to be useful in the description of age-associated memory impairment.

Conclusions

Subclinical cognitive impairment was found to not constitute a unitary phenomenon and heterogeneous subgroups could be differentiated. The concept of ‘normality’ in elderly cohorts is reconsidered in the light of these findings.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crook, T., Bartus, R. T., Ferris, S. H., et al (1986) Age-associated memory impairment: proposed diagnostic criteria and measures of clinical change. Report of a National Institute of Mental Health Workgroup. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2, 261276.Google Scholar
Fillenbaum, G. G. (1980) Comparison of two brief tests of organic brain impairment, the MSQ and the Short Portable MSQ. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 28, 381384.Google Scholar
Kral, V. A. (1958) Neuropsychiatric observations in an old people's home: studies of memory dysfunction in senescence. Journal of Gerontology, 13, 169176.Google Scholar
Kral, V. A. (1962) Senescent forgetfulness: benign and senescent. Journal of the Canadian Medical Association, 86, 257260.Google Scholar
Letenneur, L., Jacqmin, H., Commenges, D., et al (1993) Cerebral and functional aging: first results on prevalence and incidence of the Paquid cohort. Methods of Information in Medicine, 32, 249251.Google Scholar
Liston, E. H. (1979) The clinical phenomenology of presenile dementia: a critical review of the literature. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2, 329336.Google Scholar
Martin, A.A., Cox, C., Brouwers, P., et al (1985) A note on different patterns of impaired and preserved cognitive abilities and their relation to episodic memory deficits in Alzheimer's patients. Brain and Language, 26, 181185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayeux, R., Stern, Y. & Spanton, S. (1985) Heterogeneity in dementia of the Alzheimer type: evidence of sub-groups. Neurology, 35, 453461.Google Scholar
Mishkin, M., Malamut, B. & Bachevalier, J. (1984) Memories and habits: two neural systems. In Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (eds Lynch, G., McGaugh, J. L. & Weinberger, N. M.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, H. E. (1991) National Adult Reading Test (NART) 2nd edition. London: NFER.Google Scholar
Nelson, H. E. & O'Connell, A. (1978) Dementia: the estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the new adult reading test. Cortex, 14, 234244.Google Scholar
O'Carroll, R. E. & Gilleard, C. J. (1986) Estimation of premorbid intelligence in dementia. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 157158.Google Scholar
Ritchie, K. & Fuhrer, R. (1992) A comparative study of the performance of screening tests for senile dementia using Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 627637.Google Scholar
Ritchie, K. & Touchon, J. (1992) Heterogeneity in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type: individual differences, progressive deterioration or clinical sub-types? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 13911398.Google Scholar
Ritchie, K., Allard, M., Huppert, F. A., et al (1993) Computerized cognitive examination of the elderly: the development of a neuropsychological examination for clinic and population use. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8, 899914.Google Scholar
Ritchie, K. & Fuhrer, R. (1994) La mise au point et la validation en France d'un test de dépistage de la démence sénile. Revue de Gériatrie, 19, 233242.Google Scholar
Ritchie, K. & Fuhrer, R. (1996) The validation of an informant screening test for irreversible cognitive decline in the elderly: performance characteristics within a general population sample. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (in press).Google Scholar
Institute, SAS (1988) SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 6.03. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. (1983) The Seattle Longitudinal Study: a twenty-one year exploration of psychometric intelligence in adulthood. In Longitudinal Studies of Adult Psychological Development (ed. Schaie, K. W.), pp. 64135. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Storandt, M., Morris, J. C., McKeel, D. W., et al (1994) Psychometric test distinction of normal ageing versus very mild Alzheimer's disease. Proceedings of the International Psychogeriatric Association, Amsterdam, June.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.