Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:13:05.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Two-Year Follow-up Study Comparing Short with Long Stay In-patient Treatment of Alcoholics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

P. J. A. Willems
Affiliation:
Littlemore Hospital, Oxford Sheffield Regional Addiction Unit, Mapperly Hospital, Nottingham, XG3 6AA
F. J. J. Letemendia
Affiliation:
Littlemore Hospital, Oxford, OX4 4XN
F. Arroyave
Affiliation:
Littlemore Hospital, Oxford, OX4 4XN

Extract

In 1965, when this study began, there were no clear guidelines about the optimum duration of in-patient treatment for alcoholics. Davies et al. (1956) had reported that at the Maudsley Hospital the aim was for a ‘short stay’ of between two and three months—but some individuals stayed for up to ten months. The policy at Warlingham Park Hospital as described by Glatt (1955) was for an in-patient stay of at least two months, though ‘on the whole about three months is the optimum period’.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1973 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davies, D. L., Shepherd, M., and Myers, E. (1956). ‘The two-year prognosis of 50 alcohol addicts after treatment in hospital.’ Quart. J. Stud. Alcohol, 17, 485502.Google Scholar
Edwards, E. (1966). ‘Hypnosis in treatment of alcohol addiction; controlled trial, with analysis of factors affecting outcome.’ Quart. J. Stud. Alchol, 27, 221–41.Google Scholar
Edwards, E. and Guthrie, S. (1967). ‘A controlled trial of inpatient and out-patient treatment of alcohol dependency.’ Lancet, i, 555–9.Google Scholar
Gerard, D. L., and Saenger, G. (1959). ‘Interval between intake and follow-up as a factor in the evaluation of patients with a drinking problem.’ Quart. J. Stud. Alcohol, 20, 620–30.Google Scholar
Glatt, M. M. (1955). ‘A treatment centre for alcoholics in a public mental hospital.’ Brit. J. Addict., 52, 55.Google Scholar
Glatt, M. M. (1961a). ‘Drinking habits of English (middle class) alcoholics.’ Acta psychiat. Scand., 37, 88113.Google Scholar
Glatt, M. M. (1961b). ‘Treatment results in an English mental hospital alcoholic unit.’ Ibid., 37, 143–68.Google Scholar
McCance, C., and McCance, P. F. (1969). ‘Alcoholism in north-east Scotland; its treatment and outcome.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 115, 189–98.Google Scholar
Madden, J. S. (1967). Letter to Editor, Lancet, i, 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health (1962). Memorandum, H.M. (62) 42. London: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Ministry of Health (1968). Memorandum, H.M. (68) 37. London: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Moore, R. A., and Murphy, T. C. (1961). ‘Denial of alcoholism as an obstacle to recovery.’ Quart. J. Stud. Alcohol, 22, 597609.Google Scholar
Pemberton, D. A. (1967). ‘A comparison of the outcome of treatment in female and male alcoholics.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 113, 367–73.Google Scholar
Rathod, N. H., Gregor, E., Blows, D., and Thomas, G. H. (1966). ‘A two-year follow-up study of alcoholic patients.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 112, 683692.Google Scholar
Ritson, B. (1968). ‘The prognosis of alcohol addicts treated by a specialised unit.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 114, 1019–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scottish Home and Health Department (1965). Alcoholism: Report on Health Services for Treatment and Rehabilitation. Edinburgh: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Vallance, M. (1965). ‘Alcoholism: a two-year follow-up study of patients admitted to the psychiatric department of a general hospital.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., III, 348–56.Google Scholar
Walton, H. J., Ritson, E. B., and Kennedy, R. I. (1966). ‘Response of alcoholics to clinic treatment.’ Brit. med. J., ii, 1171–4.Google Scholar
Willems, P. J. A., Letemendia, F. J. J., and Arroyave, F. (1973). ‘A categorisation for the assessment of prognosis and outcome in the treatment of alcoholism.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 122, 649–54.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1952). Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld. Hlth. Org., No. 48.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.