Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:03:25.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theories of Learning and the Psychotherapeutic Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Judd Marmor
Judd Marmor*
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a number of previous communications (10, 11, 12) I have advanced the thesis that in successful psychotherapy what goes on is a unique kind of learning process in which the therapist employs his particular theoretical frame of reference as a rational basis for explaining the patient's past and present difficulties, and by non-verbal as well as verbal cues uses the instrument of a warm empathic human relationship as a means of helping the patient to persist in the difficult task of combating his anxieties, overcoming his resistance to change, and learning more mature patterns of adaptation. This underlying modus operandi is essentially the same in different “schools” of dynamic psychiatry, despite their ideological variations. In the present communication I propose to outline some of the significant areas in which the findings from learning theory experiments are applicable to what goes on in psychotherapy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 112 , Issue 485 , April 1966 , pp. 363 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1966 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Alexander, F. (1946). “The principle of flexibility”, Chapter 3 in Alexander, F. and French, T. M., Psychoanalytic Therapy. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
2. Bandura, A. (1961). “Psychotherapy as a learning process” Psychol. Bull, 58, 143.Google Scholar
3. Bandura, A. (1963). Behavioristic Psychotherapy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
4. Buhler, K. (1929). Die Krise der Psychologie, 2nd Ed. Jena: Gustav Fischer, p. 136.Google Scholar
5. Estes, W. K. (1944). “An experimental study of punishment”, Psychol. Monogr., 57, No. 263.Google Scholar
6. Hilgard, E. R. (1956). Theories of Learning, 2nd Ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.Google Scholar
7. Krasner, L. (1958). “Studies of the conditioning of verbal behaviour” Psychol. Bull., 55, 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Krasner, L. (1963). “The therapist as a social reinforcement machine”, in Strupp, H. H. and Luborsky, L., Eds., Research in Psychotherapy. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Psych. Ass. Google Scholar
9. Lewin, K. (1942). “Field theory and learning”, Chapter 4 in The Psychology of Learning. Nat. Soc. Stud. Educ., 41st Yearbook. Google Scholar
10. Marmor, J. (1962). “Psychoanalytic therapy as an educational process”, in Science and Psychoanalysis, Vol. V, Masserman, J. H., Ed. New York: Grune and Stratton, Inc., p. 286.Google Scholar
11. Marmor, J. (1962). “A re-evaluation of certain aspects of psychoanalytic theory and practice”, in Modern Concepts of Psychoanalysis, Salzman, L. and Masserman, J. H., Eds. New York: Philosophical Library, Inc., p. 191.Google Scholar
12. Marmor, J. (1964). “Psychoanalytic therapy and theories of learning”, in Science and Psychoanalysis, Vol. VII, Masserman, J. H., Ed. New York: Grune and Stratton, Inc., p. 265.Google Scholar
13. Miller, N. E., and Dollard, J. C. (1941). Social Learning and Imitation. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
14. Shoben, E. J. Jr. (1949). “Psychotherapy as a problem in learning theory” Psychol. Bull., 46, 366.Google Scholar
15. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms : An Experimental Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.Google Scholar
16. Wolpe, J. (1963). “Quantitative relationships in the systematic desensitization of phobias” Amer. J. of Psychiatry, Vol. 119, May, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Yerkes, R. M. (1927). “The mind of a gorilla” Genetic Psychol. Monogr., p. 156.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.