Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:01:25.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Termination of Pregnancy and Psychiatric Morbidity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Anne C. Gilchrist ,
Philip C. Hannaford ,
Peter Frank  and
Clifford R. Kay
Anne C. Gilchrist
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Manchester
Philip C. Hannaford*
Affiliation:
Royal College of General Practitioners, Manchester Research Unit
Peter Frank
Affiliation:
Royal College of General Practitioners, Manchester Research Unit
Clifford R. Kay
Affiliation:
Royal College of General Practitioners, Manchester Research Unit
*
Dr P. C. Hannaford, Royal College of General Practitioners, Manchester Research Unit, Parkway House, Palatine Road, Northenden, Manchester, M22 4DB.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

We investigated whether reported psychiatric morbidity was increased after termination of pregnancy compared with other outcomes of an unplanned pregnancy.

Method

This was a prospective cohort study of 13 261 women with an unplanned pregnancy. Psychiatric morbidity reported by GPs after the conclusion of the pregnancy was compared in four groups: women who had a termination of pregnancy (6410), women who did not request a termination (6151), women who were refused a termination (379), and women who changed their minds before the termination was performed (321).

Results

Rates of total reported psychiatric disorder were no higher after termination of pregnancy than after childbirth. Women with a previous history of psychiatric illness were most at risk of disorder after the end of their pregnancy, whatever its outcome. Women without a previous history of psychosis had an apparently lower risk of psychosis after termination than postpartum (relative risk RR = 0.4, 95% confidence interval CI = 0.3–0.7), but rates of psychosis leading to hospital admission were similar. In women with no previous history of psychiatric illness, deliberate self-harm (DSH) was more common in those who had a termination (RR 1.7, 95%CI 1.1–2.6), or who were refused a termination (RR 2.9, 95%CI 1.3–6.3).

Conclusions

The findings on DSH are probably explicable by confounding variables, such as adverse social factors, associated both with the request for termination and with subsequent self-harm. No overall increase in reported psychiatric morbidity was found.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 167 , Issue 2 , August 1995 , pp. 243 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Athanasiou, R., Oppel, W., Michelson, L., et al (1973) Psychiatric sequelae to term birth and induced early and late abortion: A longitudinal study. Family Planning Perspectives, 5, 227–231.Google Scholar
Belsey, E. M., Greer, H. S., Lal, S., et al (1977) Predictive factors in emotional response to abortion: King's Termination Study IV. Social Science A Medicine, 11, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, C. (1977) Incidence of post-abortion psychosis: a prospective study. British Medical Journal i, 476–477.Google Scholar
Dagg, P. K. B. (1991) The psychological sequelae of therapeutic abortion-denied and completed. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 578–585.Google Scholar
David, H. P., Rasmussen, N. K. & Holst, E. (1981) Postpartum and postabortion psychotic reactions. Family Planning Perspectives, 13, 88–92.Google Scholar
Doane, B. K. & Quigley, B. G. (1981) Psychiatric aspects of therapeutic abortion. Canadian Medical Journal, 125, 427–432.Google Scholar
Elder, S. H. & Laurence, K. M. (1991) The impact of supportive intervention after second trimester termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality. Prenatal Diagnosis, 11, 47–54.Google Scholar
Gabrielson, I. W. (1984) Suicide attempts in a population pregnant as teenagers. In Suicide in Pregnancy (eds Kleiner, G. J. & Greston, W. M.), pp. 125–140. Bristol: Wright.Google Scholar
Greer, H. S., Lal, S., Lewis, S. C., et al (1976) Psychosocial consequences of therapeutic abortion. King's Termination Study III. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 74–79.Google Scholar
Kay, C. R. & Frank, P. I. (1981) Characteristics of women recruited to a long-term study of the sequelae of induced abortion. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 31, 473–477.Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E., Chalmers, J. C. & Platz, C. (1987) Epidemiology of puerperal psychoses. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 662–673.Google Scholar
Moseley, D. T., Follingstad, D. R., Harley, H., et al (1981) Psychological factors that predict reaction to abortion. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 276–279.Google Scholar
Office Of Population Census And Surveys (1994) Conceptions in England and Wales 1991: residents of regional and district health authority areas. Series FM1 94/1. London: OPCS.Google Scholar
Shusterman, L. R. (1979) Predicting the psychological consequences of abortion. Social Science A Medicine, 13A, 683–689.Google Scholar
Whitlock, F. A. (1984) Pregnancy, suicide, and attempted suicide: Marital status, interpersonal relations, and social factors. In Suicide in Pregnancy (eds Kleiner, G. J. & Greston, W. M.), pp 63–71. Bristol: Wright.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1967) Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, 1965 revision (8th edn) (ICD-8). Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Zabin, L. S., Hirsch, M. B. & Emerson, M. R. (1989) When urban adolescents choose abortion: Effects on education, psychological status and subsequent pregnancy. Family Planning Perspectives, 21, 248–255.Google Scholar
Zolese, G. & Blacker, C. V. R. (1992) The psychological complications of therapeutic abortion. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 742–749.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.