Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:59:48.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Suspending disbelief: do we unfairly distrust our patients?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2009 

As a medical student on the first day of my psychiatry attachment, I was sent to interview an in-patient with schizophrenia. I listened, innocent and enthralled, as he informed me in extensive detail how his employers had bugged his house, spiked his drinks, and recruited his neighbours to spy on him. ‘But that's outrageous!’ I exclaimed earnestly, ‘They can't be allowed to do that. Why don't you tell the police?’

Some years on, I am pleased to say that my ability to spot the floridly psychotic and delusional patient has improved. But two recent experiences have made me question whether psychiatrists sometimes go too far in the opposite direction. A young man with personality disorder known to psychiatric services presented to accident and emergency shortly after a relationship breakdown, claiming he was unable to move his left arm and leg. On hearing of his history, psychiatric opinion sought by the acute stroke team attributed his symptoms firmly to conversion disorder, deeming further investigations both unhelpful and unnecessary. Three days later, magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large right middle cerebral artery infarct. Within a week of this experience, it came to light that an elderly patient with advanced dementia and behavioural problems, who for months had been ignored as he repeatedly talked about his carers abusing him, had in fact been describing a real situation. Discussion with experienced psychiatrists revealed that such occurrences are by no means unique or isolated.

In practice, it is easy to dismiss any unusual or improbable claim a mentally ill patient makes as untrue. Being confronted by a daily barrage of unreality–ranging from the psychotic patient with frankly bizarre delusions, to the manipulative patient intending to deceive–psychiatrists perhaps more than any other specialists are at risk of developing blanket cynicism and distrust. Elyn Saks, an American professor of law and psychiatry who herself suffered from schizophrenia, describes in her autobiographical account (The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness; Virago, 2007) how her own subarachnoid haemorrhage was missed by experienced doctors, based on the unspoken assumption that anything a patient with a psychiatric history said was untrue. Is this attitude just another form of stigmatisation of people with mental illness?

Clearly we cannot believe everything we hear. But perhaps we should be more amenable to keeping an open mind, guarding against our own prejudices, and to investigating further in cases of uncertainty. This approach not only reduces the risk of missing a real physical or social problem, but also helps us to develop open and supportive relationships with vulnerable patients. For few things destroy trust and hope more effectively than being disbelieved when we really are telling the truth.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.