Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:23:44.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Factors and Neurosis in a Working-Class Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

D. A. Pond ,
A. Ryle  and
Madge Hamilton
D. A. Pond
Affiliation:
University College Hospital
A. Ryle
Affiliation:
The Caversham Centre, 25 Caversham Road, Kentish Town, London, N.W.5
Madge Hamilton
Affiliation:
The Caversham Centre, 25 Caversham Road, Kentish Town, London, N.W.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the course of a study of families containing children of primary school age, we have collected detailed social and medical histories of the parents. In earlier papers (Ryle and Hamilton, 1962; Hamilton et al., 1962) based upon part of the population studied here, we have confirmed the reliability of the Cornell Medical Index (C.M.I.) as an indicator of neurosis. The aim of the present paper is to investigate whether social factors within a relatively homogeneous, largely working-class population, are related to neuroticism. While differences in the rate of neurosis between the social classes have often been described, interpretations of these differences are difficult because they may be due not only to variations in the rate of illness but also to differences in the mode of presentation, in symptomatology or in attitudes to medical treatment or to research enquiry. On the other hand, in studying a population such as ours, with small social class differences, the range of social factors available for measurement is reduced.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 109 , Issue 462 , September 1963 , pp. 587 - 591
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1963 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brodman, K., Erdman, A. J., Lorge, I., and Wolff, H. G. (1949) J.A.M.A., 140 (6), 530.Google Scholar
Brodman, K., Erdman, A. J., Lorge, I., and Wolff, H. G. (1951). Ibid., 145 (3), 152.Google Scholar
Brodman, K., Erdman, A. J., Lorge, I., and Wolff, H. G. (1952). J. Clin. Psychol., 8, 119.Google Scholar
Brodman, K., Erdman, A. J., Lorge, I., and Wolff, H. G. (1954). Ibid., 3(I), 119.Google Scholar
Brown, A. C., and Fry, J., (1962). J. Psychosom. Res., 6, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpan, R. H., Davies, B. M., and Oppenheim, A. N. (1960). Brit. Med. J., I, 8, 55.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M., Pond, D. A., and Ryle, A. (1962). J. Psychosom Res., 6, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, A., and Hamilton,M. (1962). J. Ment. Sci., 108, 454, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.