Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:00:49.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Six-Months, Fixed-Term, Once Weekly Psychotherapy: A Report on 20 Cases with Follow-ups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Harold Stewart
Harold Stewart*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University College Hospital, W.C.1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The difficulties in providing adequate psychotherapy facilities in the N.H.S. are well known, and various psychotherapeutic techniques have been used to try to cope with them. Of these the most important have been variants of group and brief psychotherapy, and it is with the latter that this paper is concerned. The technique I have used in this series is to offer patients once-weekly psychotherapy for a maximum period of 6 months and then to terminate no matter what progress has been made, the patient having been informed of these conditions from the start. In this paper I shall consider the criteria used in the selection of patients, the technique and probable mode of action, a brief account of the cases with the therapeutic results obtained, and the follow-up on these cases.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 121 , Issue 563 , October 1972 , pp. 425 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1972 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Freeman, T. (1967). ‘Psycho-analytical psychotherapy in the National Health Service.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 113, 321–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malan, D. (1963). A Study of Brief Psychotherapy. London.Google Scholar
Sandler, J., Holder, A. and Dare, C. (1970). ‘Basic psychoanalytic concepts, II. The treatment alliance.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 555–8.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.