Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:17:21.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semi-structured Depression Scale Sensitive to Change with Treatment for Use in the Elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

A. V. Ravindran ,
K. Welburn  and
J. R. M. Copeland
A. V. Ravindran*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Royal Ottawa Hospital, 1145 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Z 7K4
K. Welburn
Affiliation:
Royal Ottawa Hospital
J. R. M. Copeland
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Liverpool, Royal Liverpool Hospital, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX
*
∗Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The construction of a semi-structured interview depression scale that is sensitive to change for use in the elderly is described. Depression items from a well validated diagnostic instrument, the Geriatric Mental State Schedule (GMSS), were used as the core items in the development of the instrument. Improvement in depression in 80 elderly patients was independently assessed with two standard rating scales for depression, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Beck Depression Inventory, and by an independent clinician's judgement before and after standard antidepressant treatment. Depression items that were sensitive to change were retained from the core items to form the new instrument. Results indicate that this scale is reliable and valid, shows better correlation with both the clinician's and the patient's judgement of improvement than the standard instruments, and is sparing of the rater's time.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 164 , Issue 4 , April 1994 , pp. 522 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn) (DSM–III). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendleson, M., et al (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.Google Scholar
Carney, M. W. P., Roth, M. & Garside, R. F. (1965) The diagnosis of depressive syndromes and the prediction of ECT response. British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 659–674.Google Scholar
Copeland, J. R. M., Kelleher, M. J., Kellett, J. M., et al (1976) A semi-structured clinical interview for the assessing of diagnosis and mental state in the elderly; the Geriatric Mental State Schedule. Psychological Medicine, 6, 439–449.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 6, 278–296.Google ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, M. (1982) Symptoms and assessment of depression. In Handbook of Affective Disorders, (ed. Paykel, E. S.), pp. 1–11. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hennekens, C. & Buring, J. (1987) Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Insel, T. & Goodwin, F. (1983) The dexamethasone suppression test: promises and problems of diagnostic laboratory tests in psychiatry. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 34, 1131–1138.Google Scholar
Koenig, H. G., Meador, K. G., Cohen, H. J., et al (1988) Self-rated depression scale and screening for major depression in the older hospitalized patient with medical illness. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 36, 699–704.Google Scholar
Montgomery, S. A. & Asberg, M. (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 382–389.Google Scholar
Post, F. (1982) Affective disorders in old age. In Handbook of Affective Disorders (ed. Paykel, E. S.), pp. 392–402. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., Burdock, E. I. & Hardesty, A. S. (1964) The mental status schedule; rationale, reliability and validity. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 5, 384–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. L., & Endicott, J. (1968) Diagno: a computer program for psychiatric diagnosis utilizing the differential diagnostic procedure. Archives of General Psychiatry, 18, 746–756.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1975) Research Diagnostic Criteria, Biometrics Research. New York State Department of Mental Hygiene.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. (1974) Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. Birley, J. L. T., Cooper, J. E., et al (1967) Reliability of a procedure for measuring and classifying present psychiatric state. British Journal of Psychiatry, 113, 499–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zung, W. K. & Green, R. L. (1972) Detection of affective disorders in the aged. In Psychopharmacology and Aging (eds Eisdofer, C. & Fann, W. E.), pp. 213–224. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.