Recent months have seen dramatic advances in schizophrenia genetics research, with the first definitive identification of specific coding variations directly affecting schizophrenia risk. Two separate genes have been implicated: common variation in C4, which codes for complement component 4, exerts a modest effect on schizophrenia risk that, in the large samples studied, Reference Sekar, Bialas, de Rivera, Davis, Hammond and Kamitaki1 was statistically significant at P = 3.5×10−24; by contrast, very rare variants disrupting SETD1A, which codes for a component of a histone methyl transferase, exert a very large effect on risk, Reference Singh, Kurki, Curtis, Purcell, Cooks and McRae2 which was significant at P = 3.3×10−9. The importance of these findings does not relate to their immediate clinical implications. At an individual level, C4 variation has a negligible effect on risk and only a very small fraction of patients will possess SETD1A variants. Rather, these findings for the first time give us a concrete opening into understanding the biology of schizophrenia.
Previous findings in schizophrenia genetics could be broadly grouped into three main classes: individual variants that were of questionable statistical significance and which await replication; genetic markers that showed statistically robust association but which were not themselves causative and that did not implicate any individual gene; 3 rare chromosomal deletions and duplications that definitely exerted a large effect on risk but which each contained multiple genes, meaning that one could not determine which were of relevance. Reference Rees, Walters, Georgieva, Isles, Chambert and Richards4 Arguably, the single exception to this would be that some pathogenic chromosome 2 deletions are so small as to only affect a single gene, NRXN1. Another exception could be made for DISC1, in that the originally reported translocation does definitely increase the risk of schizophrenia and other mental disorders. Reference St Clair, Blackwood, Muir, Walker, St Clair and Muir5 However, no other disease-causing variants in DISC1 have been conclusively identified, despite extensive attempts. Thus, the latest findings are widely perceived as marking a real step forward and as taking us into new territory.
Findings relating to C4
The study of C4 was driven by the finding that many markers in the HLA region, where it is located, demonstrate significant association with schizophrenia. Reference Sekar, Bialas, de Rivera, Davis, Hammond and Kamitaki1 Intensive studies of the gene revealed that it could vary in any of three different ways: the number of copies of the gene on each chromosome can vary; each copy can be ‘long’ or ‘short’, depending on whether or not it harbours a small insertion of viral origin; a variation in DNA sequence means that each copy can be denoted as either ‘C4A’ or ‘C4B’, with these two forms of the gene producing versions of the protein product having different properties. The specific C4 gene or genes found on a chromosome can be referred to as a haplotype and the study showed that four different haplotypes commonly occur. The level of C4A expression produced by each haplotype varies and the predicted C4A expression correlated with schizophrenia risk at P = 3.5×10−24. The highest risk haplotype, consisting of two long forms of C4A, confers increased risk by a factor of 1.27 over the lowest risk haplotype, consisting of a single copy of the short form of C4B. The study also demonstrated that complement component 4 is found on neurons and synapses, so it would be legitimate to speculate that increased C4A expression could lead to increased synaptic pruning. Indeed, the authors were able to demonstrate that mice manipulated to lack C4 had reduced synaptic pruning.
Findings relating to SETD1A
The SETD1A study represented an extension and confirmation of previous research that had demonstrated that people with schizophrenia with unaffected parents could possess de novo variants, i.e. not found in either parent, which disrupted SETD1A. Reference Takata, Xu, Ionita-Laza, Roos, Gogos and Karayiorgou6 The recent study demonstrated this was a more widespread phenomenon, confirming its validity. Reference Singh, Kurki, Curtis, Purcell, Cooks and McRae2 Loss of function (LOF) variants were defined as those which would seriously disrupt correct translation of the gene, either through introducing a premature stop codon, shifting the reading frame or preventing normal splicing. Such LOF variants were found in a total of 10 out of nearly 8000 people with schizophrenia but none of over 13 000 controls. This implies that if one has only one working copy of this gene, rather than two, then the risk of developing schizophrenia is very substantially increased. LOF variants in SETD1A were also identified in 4 out of 3148 children with diverse, severe, developmental disorders, suggesting that this can be an alternative outcome. SETD1A is involved in the methylation of a lysine residue in histone tails, a process that leads to increased expression of other genes. In particular, there are suggestions that this may affect genes involved in synaptic function and GABAergic signalling, as well as dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission. Reference Dincer, Gavin, Xu, Zhang, Dudley and Schadt7 It is of note that mutations in genes with similar function to SETD1A are known to cause developmental disorders such as Wiedemann–Steiner syndrome, Kleefstra syndrome and Kabuki syndrome. Likewise, there is independent evidence that other genes involved in histone modification also influence risk of schizophrenia. 8,Reference Curtis9
Implications of recent findings
Thus, these two findings appear to implicate two very different biological pathways affecting schizophrenia risk. The former demonstrates a role for complement, perhaps specifically that increased C4A expression leads to increased synaptic pruning. Although the effect of naturally occurring variation is small, this does not mean that pharmacological targeting of this process might not exert substantial effects on the development and/or course of schizophrenia. The latter finding implicates broad effects on gene expression that seem to result in a surprisingly narrow phenotypic effect. Because of the magnitude of this effect, one could argue that testing for SETD1A variants should become part of the routine management of schizophrenia, alongside testing for pathogenic copy number variants. Reference Rees, Walters, Georgieva, Isles, Chambert and Richards4
The implications of these findings are so far-reaching that it is impossible to do them justice in the space available. Both will be followed by molecular studies that will seek to gain further insight into the mechanisms by which these variants affect risk and this process is likely to lead to the implication of additional related genes. Thus, although the contribution which the currently identified variants make towards the overall risk of schizophrenia in the population is small, the concrete nature of these findings means that it is reasonable to expect that they will progress towards a situation in which we attain a far more substantial understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in schizophrenia aetiology. Many workers in psychiatric genetics feel that the field has entered a long-awaited new phase and look forward with enthusiasm to further developments.
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.