Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:38:10.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Scale for Predicting Subsequent Suicidal Behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Dorothy Buglass  and
John Horton
Dorothy Buglass
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Unit for Epidemiological Studies in Psychiatry, University Department of Psychiatry, Morningside Park, Edinburgh EH10 5HF
John Horton
Affiliation:
University of Washington School of Medicine; currently Department of Psychiatry, Mount Zion Hospital and Medical Center, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Between 1962 and 1970, the male parasuicide (attempted suicide) rate in Edinburgh has doubled, and the rate for women shows a 70 per cent increase (Kreitman, 1972). Of those who are admitted following a parasuicidal act a substantial proportion are readmitted—approximately 15 per cent within 12 months and 25 per cent within three years. Parasuicide is a sign of severe distress, and repetition indicates that the distress has not been adequately alleviated. A means of early identification of the potential repeaters would be valuable.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 124 , Issue 583 , June 1974 , pp. 573 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1974 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baglby, C., and Greer, S. (1971). ‘Clinical and social predictors of repeated attempted suicide: a multivariate analysis.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 119, 515—21Google Scholar
Buglass, D., and McCulloch, J. W. (1970). ‘Further suicidal behaviour: the development and validation of predictive scales.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 483—91.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, N., Hicks, R., and Kreitman, N. (1973). ‘Evaluation of an after-care service for parasuicide patients.’ Social Psychiatry, 8, 67—81.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D., Ohlin, L. E., Reiss, A. J., and Stanton, H. R. (1953). ‘Formal devices for making selection decisions.’ American Journal of Sociology, 58, 573—84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreitman, N. (1972). ‘Aspects of the epidemiology of suicide and “attempted suicide” (parasuicide).’ Skandia International Symposia: Suicide and Attempted Suicide, pp. 45–52. Stockholm: Nordiska Bokhandelns Forlag.Google Scholar
Matthew, H., Proudfoot, A. T., Brown, S. S., and Aitken, R. C. B. (1969). ‘Acute poisoning: organization and work-loads of a treatment centre.’ British Medical Journal, iii, 489—93.Google Scholar
Ovenstone, I. M. K. (1973). ‘A psychiatric approach to the diagnosis of suicide and its effect on the Edinburgh statistics.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 123, 15—21.Google Scholar
Rosen, A. (1954). ‘Detection of suicidal patients: An example of some limitations in the prediction of infrequent events.’ Journal of Consulting Psychology, 18, 397—403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, F. H. (1971). Prediction Methods in Criminology. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Stengel, E. (1964). Suicide and Attempted Suicide. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.