Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:19:07.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship between the Maudsley Personality Inventory and the Course of Affective Disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

T. A. Kerr ,
Kurt Schapira ,
Martin Roth  and
R. F. Garside
T. A. Kerr
Affiliation:
Psychological Medicine Research Unit, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Kurt Schapira
Affiliation:
Psychological Medicine Research Unit, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Martin Roth
Affiliation:
Psychological Medicine Research Unit, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
R. F. Garside
Affiliation:
Psychological Medicine Research Unit, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Maudsley Personality Inventory (Eysenck, 1959a) measures the two factors of neuroticism and extraversion, which are considered to be independent and relatively stable aspects of personality in normal subjects. Bartholomew and Marley (1959) tentatively concluded that changes in the mental state did not greatly affect the N and E scores, and Mezey et al. (1963) found that the scores re mained relatively constant during depressive illness, although there was a slight increase in neuroticism. McGuire et al. (1963) noted that the relationship between N and E scores ceased to be orthogonal during illness when the scores became negatively correlated. Knowles (1960) found relatively high test-retest correlations in both a normal group and a neurotic group after a year, although the correlations in the neurotic group were lower than in the normal group; he also found some evidence that fluctuations in clinical state influenced the stability of the N scores. Moreover, on measuring neuroticism and extraversion with the Eysenck Personality Inventory (Eysenck and Eysenck, 1964), Knowles and Kreitman (1965) concluded that N (but not E) scores were influenced to a small but significant degree by changes in the patients' clinical state. Coppen and Metcalfe (1965) found that the mean N score of a group of depressed patients decreased significantly on recovery and that there was an associated significant increase in the mean E score. These changes were most marked in patients with endogenous depression. The scores of the recovered patients were within normal limits. Ingham (1966) demonstrated essentially similar changes over a three year period in a group of neurotic patients.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 116 , Issue 530 , January 1970 , pp. 11 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartholomew, A. A., and Marley, E. (1959). ‘The temporal reliability of the Maudsley Personality Inventory’. J. ment. Sci., 105, 238–40.Google Scholar
Coppen, A., and Metcalfe, M. (1965). ‘Effect of a depressive illness on MPI scores.’ Psychiat., III, 236–9.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1956). ‘The questionnaire measurement of neuroticism and extraversion.’ Riv, di Psicol., 50, 113–40.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1959a). Manual of the Maudsley Personality Inventory. London.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1959b). ‘The differentiation between normal and various neurotic groups on the Maudsley Personality Inventory.’ Brit. J. Psychol., 50, 176–7.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Eysenck, Sybil B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London.Google Scholar
Ingham, J. G. (1966). ‘Changes in MPI scores in neurotic patients: a three year follow-up.’ Brit. J. Psychol., 112, 931–9.Google Scholar
Ingham, J. G. and Robinson, J. O. (1964). ‘Personality in the diagnosis of hysteria.’ Brit.J. Psychol., 55, 253–94.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. H. W., and Walter, C. J. S. (1968). ‘The relationship between clinical diagnosis and anxiety, assessed by forearm blood flow and other measurements.’ Brit. J. Psychiat. 114, 611–26.Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E., and DiScipio, W. J. (1968). ‘Eysenck Personality Inventory scores of patients with depressive illnesses.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., 114, 767–70.Google Scholar
Knowles, J. B. (1960). ‘The temporal stability of MPI scores in normal and psychiatric populations.’ J. consult. Psychol., 24, 278.Google Scholar
Knowles, J. B. and Kreitman, N. (1965). ‘The Eysenck Personality Inventory: some considerations.’ Brit. J. Psychiat., III, 755–9.Google Scholar
Little, J. C. (1966). ‘Physical prowess and neurosis.’ M.D. Thesis. University of Bristol.Google Scholar
McGuire, R. J., Mowbray, R. M., and Vallance, R. C. (1963). ‘The Maudsley Personality Inventory used with psychiatric patients.’ Brit. J. Psychol., 54, 157–66.Google Scholar
McNemar, Q. (1962). Psychological Statistics. 3rd edn. New York, Willey.Google Scholar
Maxwell, A. E. (1961). Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, M. (1968). ‘The personality of depressive patients.’ In: Recent Developments in Affective Disorder. ed. A. Coppen and A. Walk British Journal of Psychiatry Special Publication No. 2.Google Scholar
Mezey, A. G., Cohen, S. I., and Knight, E. J. (1963). ‘Personality assessment under varying physiological and psychological conditions.’ J. psychosom. Res., 7, 237–40.Google Scholar
Roth, M. (1959). ‘The phobic anxiety-depersonalization syndrome.’ Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 52, 587–96.Google Scholar
Roth, M. (1960). ‘The phobic anxiety-depersonalisation syndrome and some general aetiological problems in psychiatry.’ J. Neuropsychiat., I, 293–306.Google Scholar
Roth, M. (1969). ‘The classification of affective disorders.’ In press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.