Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:07:56.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rationale and Clinical Relevance of Repertory Grid Technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

D. Bannister
D. Bannister*
Affiliation:
Bexley Hospital, Dartford Heath, Bexley, Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

All forms of Repertory Grid technique are derivatives of an original proposed by G. A. Kelly (1955) as an integral part of the development of Personal Construct Theory (summarized Bannister, 1962). In essence, repertory grids are forms of sorting test. They differ from conventional sorting tests in that there are no standard sorting materials or sorting categories nor is there any standard single form of administration or scoring procedure. Their unique characteristics are that:

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 111 , Issue 479 , October 1965 , pp. 977 - 982
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1965 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannister, D. (1960). “Conceptual structure in thought disordered schizophrenics” J. ment. Sci., 106, 1230–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, D. (1962a). “Personal construct theory: a summary and experimental paradigm. Acta Psychol., 20, 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, D. (1962). “The nature and measurement of schizophrenic thought disorder” J. ment. Sci., 108, 825–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannister, D. (1963). “The genesis of schizophrenic thought disorder: a serial invalidation hypothesis” Brit. J. Psychiat., 109, 680–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, A. H. (1964). “An attempt to measure an aspect of ‘transference’” Brit. J. med. Psychol., 37, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fager, R. E. (1958). “Student and faculty conceptions of ‘successful student’” J. cons. Psychol., 5, 98–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransella, F., and Adams, B. (1965). “An illustration of the use of repertory grid technique in a clinical setting” Brit. J. soc. clin. Psychol. In press.Google Scholar
Kasper, S. (1962). “Measurement of adjustment in adolescents: an extension of personal construct theory and methodology” Psychol. Monogr., 76, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton, New York. Vols. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. (1961). “The abstraction of human processes” Proc. 14th Internat. Cong. App. Psychol., Copenhagen, 220–229.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. (1963). Introduction Manual for IBM 1620 Program to Process George Kelly's Rep. Grid. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Levy, L. H. (1956). “Personal constructs and predictive behavior” J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 53, 54–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runkel, P. J., and Damrin, D. E. (1961). “Effects of training and anxiety upon teachers' preference for information about students” J. educ. Psychol., 52, 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sechrest, L. B. (1962). “Stimulus equivalents of the psychotherapist” J. ind. Psychol., 18, 172–176.Google Scholar
Slater, P. (1965). The Principal Components of a Repertory Grid. Maudsley Hospital.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.