Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:56:22.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rational Decision Making in Psychiatry: Evidence-Based Psychiatry is Just the Start

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

Trevor A. Sheldon  and
Simon M. Gilbody
Trevor A. Sheldon
Affiliation:
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YOI 5DD
Simon M. Gilbody
Affiliation:
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YOI 5DD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Geddes and Harrison make the case simply and persuasively for the value of a systematic approach to identifying and applying research evidence in clinical practice. No sensible psychiatrist, nurse or other therapist can justify a situation where patterns of practice are overly influenced by fashion, tradition, what the chief of staff happens to believe, or what the adverts claim, independent of the scientific basis, as represented by the results of valid experimental research.

Type
Evidence-Based Psychiatry
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 171 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 226 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Maynard, A. (1997) Evidence-based medicine: an incomplete method for informing choices. Lancet, 349, 126–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanenbaum, S. J. (1994) Knowing and acting in medical practice: The epistemological politics of outcomes research. Journal of Health Politics. Policy and Law, 19, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, A. (1994) How should information on cost-effectiveness influence clinical practice? In Outcomes into Clinical Practice (ed. Delamonthe, T.), pp. 99–107. London: BMJ Publishing.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.