Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:11:25.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychiatric Interviewing Techniques III. Naturalistic Study: Eliciting Feelings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

K. Hopkinson ,
A. Cox  and
M. Rutter
K. Hopkinson
Affiliation:
c/o The Coverdale Organisation, 3 Logan Place, London W8
A. Cox
Affiliation:
The Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ
M. Rutter
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Camberwell, London SE5 8AF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A naturalistic study was undertaken of 36 video and audio-taped interviews undertaken by 7 different psychiatric trainees. The interviews studied were those conducted in the ordinary course of clinic work for diagnostic and therapeutic planning purposes by trainees when first seeing the parent or parents of a child newly referred to a psychiatric clinic. It was found that a variety of rather different interview techniques seemed to facilitate emotional expression. These included a low level of interview talk with few interruptions, a high rate of open rather than closed questions, direct requests for feelings, interpretations and expressions of sympathy. The issue of how far these associations reflected causal influences is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 138 , Issue 5 , May 1981 , pp. 406 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, S. C. (1968) Effects of confrontation by high-and-low functioning therapists. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 15, 411–416.Google Scholar
Bierman, R. (1969) Dimensions of interpersonal facilitation in psychotherapy and child development. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 338–352.Google Scholar
Cox, A. Holbrook, D. & Rutter, M. (1981) Psychiatric interviewing techniques: VI. Experimental study; eliciting feelings. British Journal of Psychiatry, in press.Google Scholar
Cox, A. Hopkinson, K. & Rutter, M. (1981) Psychiatric interviewing techniques: II. Naturalistic study; eliciting factual information. British Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 283–291.Google Scholar
Cox, A. & Rutter, M. (1977) Diagnostic appraisal and interviewing. In Child Psychiatry: Modern Approaches, (eds. Rutter, M. and Hersov, L.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Cox, A. Rutter, M. & Holbrook, D. (1981) Psychiatric interviewing techniques: V. Experimental study; eliciting factual information. British Journal of Psychiatry, in press.Google Scholar
Garduk, E. L. & Haggard, E. A. (1972) Immediate effects on patients of psychoanalytic interpretations. Psychological Issues. Vol. VIII, No. 4, Monograph 28.Google Scholar
Greenspoon, J. (1962) Verbal conditioning and clinical psychology. Experimental Foundations of Clinical Psychology, (ed. Bachrach, A. J.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Heller, K. Davis, J. & Myers, R. A. (1966) The effects of interviewer style in a standardised interview. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, B. (1979) The Mental Health Interview: Research and Application. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, B. & Siegman, A. W. (1965) Interviewer specificity and topical focus in relation to interviewer productivity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 4, 188–192.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (1975) Helping Troubled Children. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. & Cox, A. (1981) Psychiatric interviewing techniques: I. Methods and Measures. British Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 273–282.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. Cox, A. Egert, S. Everitt, B. & Holbrook, D. (1981) Psychiatric interviewing techniques: IV. Experimental study; four contrasting styles. British Journal of Psychiatry, 138, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegman, A. W. & Pope, B. (eds.) (1972) Studies in Dyadic Communication. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.