Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:51:47.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of psychosis

A step towards indicated prevention of schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2018

Alison R. Yung ,
Lisa J. Phillips ,
Patrick D. McGorry ,
Colleen A. McFarlane ,
Shona Francey ,
Susan Harrigan ,
George C. Patton  and
Henry J. Jackson
Alison R. Yung*
Affiliation:
Centre for Young People's Mental Health, Victoria, Australia
Lisa J. Phillips
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Victoria, Australia
Patrick D. McGorry
Affiliation:
Centre for Young People's Mental Health, Victoria, Australia
Colleen A. McFarlane
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Victoria, Australia
Shona Francey
Affiliation:
Early Psychosis Research Centre, Victoria Australia
Susan Harrigan
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne, Australia
George C. Patton
Affiliation:
Centre for Adolescent Health, Victoria, Australia
Henry J. Jackson
Affiliation:
Early Psychosis Research Centre, Victoria Australia
*
Correspondence: A. R. Yung, Centre for Young People's Mental Health, 35 Polar Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background The identification of people at high risk of becoming psychotic within the near future creates opportunities for early intervention prior to the onset of psychosis to prevent or minimise later ill-health. The present study combines current knowledge about risk factors for schizophrenia with our knowledge of psychotic prodromes in an attempt to identify a group particularly vulnerable to impending psychosis. We wanted to identify people with high likelihood of transition to psychosis within a follow-up period of 12 months, and to determine the rate of transition to psychosis in this group.

Method Various state and trait risk factors for psychosis were used alone and in combination to operationally define a putatively high-risk group. Operationalised criteria for onset of psychosis were established. The individuals were assessed monthly on measures of psychopathology for six months.

Results Eight out of 20 people made the transition to frank psychosis within a six-month follow-up period. Follow-up of this group is still in progress, and the 12 month transition rate might prove to be higher still.

Conclusions We have demonstrated that it is possible to identify individuals with a high likelihood of onset of psychosis within a brief follow-up period. This lays the foundation for early treatment in an attempt to prevent, delay or minimise the severity of first onset of schizophrenia.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 172 , Issue S33: Verging on reality , June 1998 , pp. 14 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. J., Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., et al (1987) Prediction of psychotic-like symptoms in hypothetically psychosis-prone college students. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM–IV). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Andreasen, N. (1982) Negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Definitions and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 784–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreasen, N. (1987) The Comprehensive Assessment of Symptoms and History (CASH) Interview. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa. Asarnow, J. R. (1988) Children at risk for schizophrenia: converging lines of evidence. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 14, 613–631.Google Scholar
Beiser, M., Erickson, D., Fleming, J. A., et al (1993) Establishing the onset of psychotic illness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1349–1354.Google Scholar
Bell, R. Q. (1992) Multiple-risk cohorts and segmenting risk as solutions to the problem of false positives in risk for the major psychoses. Psychiatry, 55, 370–381.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E. (1911) Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. E. (1938) Early schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 95, 567–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. (1966) The early symptoms of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 225–251.Google Scholar
Chapman, L. J. & Chapman, J. P. (1980) Scales for rating psychotic and psychotic-like experiences as continua. Schizophrenia bulletin, 6, 476–489.Google Scholar
Chapman, L. J. & Chapman, J. P. (1987) The search for symptoms predictive of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 497–503.Google Scholar
Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., R., Kwapil. T., et al (1994) Putatively psychosis-prone subjects 10 years later. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 171–183.Google Scholar
Claridge, G. (1987) The schizophrenias as nervous types revisited. British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 735–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaton, W.W., Badawi, M. & Melton, B. (1995) Prodromes and precursors: epidemiologic data for primary prevention of disorders with slow onset. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 967–972.Google ScholarPubMed
Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L., Cornblatt, B., Rock, D., et al (1993) The New York High Risk Project: Anhedonia, attentional deviance and psychopathology. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 19, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faergman, P. (1963) Psychogenic Psychoses. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Falloon, I. R. H. (1992) Early intervention for first episodes of schizophrenia: a preliminary exploration. Psychiatry, 55, 4–15.Google Scholar
Gottesman, I. I. & Shields, J. (1982) Schizophrenia: the Epigenetic Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner, H., Maurer, K., Loffler, W., et al (1993) The influence of age and sex on the onset and early course of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 80–86.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (I960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, D., Hanlon, T. & Carpenter, W. (1984) The Quality of Life Scale: An instrument for rating the schizophrenia deficit syndrome. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 10, 388–398.Google Scholar
Jauch, D. A. & Carpenter, W.T. (1988) Reactive psychosis, I: does the DSM–III concept define a third psychosis? Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kety, S. S., Rosenthal, D., Wender, P. H., et al (1975) Mental illness in the biological and adoptive families of adoptive individuals who have become schizophrenic: a preliminary report based on psychiatric interviews. In: Genetic Research in Psychiatry (eds Rieve, R. R., Rosenthal, D. & Brill, H.), pp. 147–165. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, T. K., McGlashan, T. H. & Moe, L. C. (1996) First-episode schizophrenia: I. Early course parameters. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22, 241–256.Google Scholar
Loebel, A. D., Lieberman, J. A., Alvir, J. M. J., et al (1992) Duration of psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1183–1188.Google Scholar
Lukoff, D., Nuechterlein, K. H., et al (1986) Manual for the Expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 12, 594–602.Google Scholar
McGlashan, T. H. & Johannessen, J. O. (1996) Early detection and intervention with schizophrenia: rationale. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22, 201–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGorry, P. D. & Singh, B. S. (1995) Schizophrenia: risk and possibility. In: Handbook of Preventive Psychiatry (eds Raphael, B. & Burrows, G. D.), pp. 492–514. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
McGorry, P. D., Edwards, J., Mihalopoulos, C., et al (1996) EPPIC: An evolving system of early detection and optimal management. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22, 305–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meares, A. (1959) The diagnosis of prepsychotic schizophrenia. Lancet, i, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mednick, S. A., Parnas, J. & Schulsinger, F. (1987) The Copenhagen High-Risk Project, 1962–1986. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 485–496.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1989) Schizotaxia revisited. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 935–944.Google Scholar
Moscarelli, M. (1994) Health and economic evaluation in schizophrenia: implications for health policies. Acta Psychiotrica Scandinavica, 89 (suppl. 382), 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrazek, P. J. & Haggerty, R. J. (eds) (1994) Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research, pp. 25. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Olin, S. S., John, R. S. & Mednick, S. A. (1995) Assessing the predictive value of teacher reports in a high risk sample for schizophrenia: a ROC analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 16, 53–66.Google Scholar
Overall, J. E. & Gorham, D. R. (1962) The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports, 10, 799–812.Google Scholar
Strauss, J. S. (1969) Hallucinations and delusions as points on continua function. Archives of General Psychiatry, 21, 581–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, H. S. (1994) The onset of schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151 (suppl. 6), 135–139.Google Scholar
Weintraub, S. (1987) Risk factors in schizophrenia: the Stony Brook high-risk project. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 439–450.Google Scholar
Young, R. C., Biggs, J. T., Ziegler, V. E., et al (1978) A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 429–435.Google Scholar
Yung, A. R. & McGorry, P. D. (1996) The prodromal phase of first episode psychosis: past and current conceptualisations. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22, 353–370.Google Scholar
Yung, A. R. & McGorry, P. D. & McFarlane, C. A. (1996) Monitoring and care of young people at incipient risk of psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22, 283–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.