Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:39:05.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and the Clapham rail accident

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

Carolyn Selley ,
Elizabeth King ,
Robert Peveler ,
Karen Osola ,
Nick Martin  and
Chris Thompson
Carolyn Selley
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton SO14 0YG
Elizabeth King
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton SO14 0YG
Robert Peveler
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton SO14 0YG
Karen Osola
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton SO14 0YG
Nick Martin
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton SO14 0YG
Chris Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton SO14 0YG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Post-traumatic stress disorder is a well recognised condition which can have long-term consequences. A rail accident to commuter trains in south London provided an opportunity, within the context of a Psychological Therapies Service, to study the prevalence and associations of the condition in a follow-up study.

Method

Postal questionnaires were completed by 187 survivors (52% response rate) 10 to 22 months after the accident, and their symptoms were compared with a commuter control group.

Results

The accident group scored significantly higher on the Impact of Events scale (IES) than the control group. Severity of physical injury was significantly associated with high IES scores. Thirty per cent of those moderately or severely injured showed high levels of intrusion or avoidance symptoms (sub-scores of 20 or more). Thirty per cent of those nearest the accident focus had high sub-scores, associated variables being the accident experience of risk of death, feeling trapped and seeing death. For those less directly involved the proportions with symptoms were similar to those of controls.

Conclusions

It is recommended that disaster services should provide for long-term psychological effects, particularly for those survivors who are injured, who experience risk of death, feeling trapped or who witness death.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 171 , Issue 5 , November 1997 , pp. 478 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, D. A. (1991) Reactions of police officers to body handling after a major disaster. British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 547–555.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn. revised) (DSM–III–R). Washington. DC: APA.Google Scholar
Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (1990) The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) (1990 Revision). Des Plaines. IL: AAAM.Google Scholar
Burns, T. P. & Hollins, S. C. (1991) Psychiatric response to the Clapham rail crash. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 84, 15–19.Google Scholar
Curran, P. S., Bell, A., Murray, G., et al (1990) Psychological consequences of the Enniskillen bombing. British Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 479–482.Google Scholar
Erstand, S., Weisarth, L. & Sund, A. (1989) The stress upon rescuers involved in an oil rig disaster. Alexander L. Kielland' 1980. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, suppl. 355, 38–49.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. & Hillier, V. F. (1979) A scale version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, B. L., Grace, M. C., Jacob, M. S., et al (1990) Risk factors for PTSD and other diagnoses in a general sample of Vietnam veterans. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 729–733.Google Scholar
Healey, M. J. R. (1988) Glim An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. (1976) Diagnosis and treatment of stress response syndromes: general principles. In Emergency and Disaster Management (eds Parad, H. J., Resnik, H. L. P. & Parad, L. G.). pp. 259–269. Bowie. MD: Charles Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. Wilner, N. & Alvarez, W. (1979) Impact of events scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.Google Scholar
Hytten, K. & Hasle, A. (1989) Fire fighters: a study of stress and coping. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, suppl. 355, 50–55.Google Scholar
Joseph, S. A., Brewin, C. R., Yule, W., et al (1991) Causal attributions and psychiatric symptoms in survivors of the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster. British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 542–546.Google Scholar
Lundin, T. (1991) Train disaster survivors: long-term effects on health and well-being. Stress Medicine, 7, 87–91.Google Scholar
Malt, U. F. & Ugland, O. M. (1989) A long term psychosocial follow up study of burned adults. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, suppl. 355, 94–102.Google Scholar
Raphael, B. (1977) The Granville train disaster: psychological needs and their management. Medical Journal of Australia, 1, 303–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raphael, B. (1986) When Disaster Strikes. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Rosser, R., Dewer, S. & Thompson, J. (1991) Psychological aftermath of the Kings Cross fire. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 84, 4–8.Google Scholar
Solomon, S. D. (1989) Research issues in assessing disaster effects. In Psychosocial Aspects of Disaster (eds Gist, R. & Lubin, B.). pp. 308–339. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. (1991) Kuwait airways highjack: psychological consequences for survivors. Stress Medicine, 7, 3–9.Google Scholar
Weisarth, L. (1989a) The stressors and the post-traumatic stress syndrome after an industrial disaster. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, suppl. 355, 25–37.Google Scholar
Weisarth, L. (1989b) Importance of high response rates in traumatic stress research. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, suppl. 355, 131–137.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. P., Smith, W. K. & Johnson, S. K. (1985) A comparative analysis of PTSD among various survivor groups. In Trauma and its Wake, Vol. 1 (ed. Figley, C.). pp. 142–172. New York: Brunner Mazel.Google Scholar
Zilberg, N., Weiss, D. & Horowitz, M. (1982) Impact of event scale: A cross-validation study and some empirical evidence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 407–414.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.