Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:10:52.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy and Medicine: the Oxford Connection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

K. W. M. Fulford
K. W. M. Fulford*
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three aspects of the approach to philosophy advocated by the Oxford philosopher J. L. Austin are outlined: his conception of the nature of philosophical problems, essentially as a mixed bag; his method of linguistic analysis, namely, clarification of our concepts by active observation of the ways in which they are actually used rather than by passive reflection on their meanings; and his views on the organisation of philosophical research, that in some areas it should be pursued rather as a science is pursued, as a corporate rather than merely individual venture. It is suggested that Austin's approach provides the basis for a potentially fruitful two-way relationship between philosophical theory and medical practice.

Type
Philosophy and Practice
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 157 , Issue 1 , July 1990 , pp. 111 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, J. L. (1956–57) A plea for excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 57, 1–30. Reprinted in White, A. R., (ed) (1968) The Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1976) The Central Questions of Philosophy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. (1975) On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 5, 49–68.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. (1976) What a theory of mental health should be. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 6, 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulford, K. W. M. (1990) Moral Theory and Medical Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helman, C. G. (1981) Disease versus illness in general practice. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 230, 548–552.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1961) Introduction to problems of taxonomy. In Field Studies in the Mental Disorders (ed J. Zubin), pp. 3–22. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., Smeeton, N., Marinker, M., et al (1985) A study in the classification of mental ill-health in general practice. Psychological Medicine, 15, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGarry, L. & Chodoff, P. (1981) The ethics of involuntary hospitalization. In Psychiatric Ethics (eds S. Bloch & P. Chodoff), chapter 11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
New, C. G. (1969) A plea for linguistics. Symposium on J. L. Austin (ed K. T. Fann), pp. 148–165. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rachman, S. J. & Philips, C. (1978) Psychology and Medicine. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Szasz, T. S. (1963) Law, Liberty and Psychiatry: An Inquiry into the Social Use of Mental Health Practices. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Warnock, G. J. (1969) John Langshaw Austin, a biographical sketch. In Symposium on J. L. Austin (ed K. T. Fann), pp. 3–21. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Warnock, G. J. (1989) J. L. Austin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.