Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:43:48.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parental Background of Homosexual and Heterosexual Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Marvin Siegelman
Marvin Siegelman*
Affiliation:
School of Education, The City College of New York, New York City, 10031, U.S.A
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The major emphasis in psychoanalytic literature has been on the aetiology of male, rather than female, homosexuality (Socarides, 1968; Wiedeman, 1962). Those psychoanalytic writers who deal with the parent-child relations of homosexual women present a wide diversity of contrasting descriptions and explanations (Bacon, 1967; Bene, 1965; Fromm and Elonen, 1951; Socarides, 1963). One systematic research approach that has evolved from the psychoanalytic literature involves the evaluation of the ‘triangular system’ hypothesis (Bieber et al., 1962). This hypothesis was formulated as an explanation for male homosexuality, and most of the studies to date that relate to it report on male samples (Siegelman, 1972b). The family pattern of the ‘triangular system’ depicted for male homosexuals is a close-binding, intimate, controlling mother and a detached, hostile, rejecting father (Bieber et al., 1962). Kaya et al., (1967), using questions and methods quite similar to Bieber et al., found that homosexual, compared to heterosexual, women patients had fathers who were close-binding and intimate—the converse of the parent behaviour noted for male homosexuals. Kaya et al., however, found that the mothers of the lesbians did not differ in behaviour from the mothers of the non-lesbians. In a study of 25 adolescent lesbian patients, Kremer and Rifkin (1969) found that the fathers of the homosexual women were hostile, exploitative, detached, and absent, but they were not close-binding. The mothers in the Kremer and Rifkin study were described as overburdened and inadequate in handling their responsibilities. Using 27 items from the Bieber et al. (1962) study, Thompson (1971) discovered that the mothers of non-clinical homosexual women were close-binding and intimate, while their fathers were hostile and detached. Many of the Bieber et al. (1962) questions were also used by Gundlach and Riess (1968), who reported that the parents of non-clinical lesbians were not different from the parents of non-lesbians.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 124 , Issue 578 , January 1974 , pp. 14 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1974 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacon, C. L. (1967). ‘A developmental theory of female homosexuality’, in The Psychotherapy of Perversions (ed. Ruitenbeek). New York: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Bell, R. Q. (1968). ‘A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization.’ Psychological Review, 75. 81–95.Google Scholar
Bene, E. (1965). ‘On the genesis of female homosexuality.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 815–21.Google Scholar
Bieber, I., Dain, H. J., Dince, P. R., Drellich, M. G., Grand, H. G., Gundlach, R. H., Kremer, M. W., Rifkin, A. H., Wilbur, C. B., and Bieber, T. B. (1962). Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1960). ‘A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.’ Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–54.Google Scholar
Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1964). The Approval Motive. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. O., and Elonen, A. S. (1951). ‘The use of projective techniques in the study of a case of female homosexuality.’ Journal of Projective Techniques, 15, 185–230.Google Scholar
Goldin, P. C. (1969). ‘A review of children's reports of parent behaviours.’ Psychological Bulletin, 71, 222–36.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, D. R. (1966). ‘Semantic differential analysis of the “triangular system” hypothesis in “adjusted” overt male homosexuals.’ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Gundlach, R. H., and Riess, B. F. (1968). ‘Self and sexual identity in the female: A study of female homosexuals’, in New Directions in Mental Health (ed. Riess). New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Hamburger, M. (1958). ‘Realism and consistency in early adolescent aspirations and expectations.’ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B., and Redlich, F. C. (1958). Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community Study. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hooker, E. (1969). ‘Parental relations and male homosexuality in patient and nonpatient samples.’ Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 140–42.Google Scholar
Kammeyer, K. (1967). ‘Birth order as a research variable.’ Social Forces, 46, 71–80.Google Scholar
Kaya, H. E., Berl, S., Clare, J., Eleston, M. R., Gershwin, B. S., Gershwin, P., Kooan, L. S., Torda, C., and Wilbur, C. B. (1967). ‘Homosexuality in women.’ Archives of General Psychiatry, 17, 626–34.Google Scholar
Kenyon, F. E. (1968). ‘Studies in female homosexuality: IV. Social and psychiatric aspects.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 1337–50.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1966). ‘A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes’, in The Development of Sex Differences (ed. Maccoby). California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kremer, M. W., and Rifkin, A. H. (1969). ‘The early development of homosexuality: A study of adolescent lesbians.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 91–6.Google Scholar
MacVicar, J. (1967). ‘Homosexual delinquent girls: Identification with mother and perception of parents.’ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Roe, A., and Siegelman, M. (1963). ‘A parent-child relations questionnaire.’ Child Development, 34, 355–69.Google Scholar
Roe, A., and Siegelman, M. (1964). ‘The origin of interests.’ American Personnel and Guidance Association Inquiry Studies, 1, 1–98.Google Scholar
Sampson, E. E. (1965). ‘The study of ordinal position: antecedents and outcomes’, in Progress in Experimental Personality Research (ed. Maher). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sgheier, I. H., and Cattell, R. B. (1961). The Neuroticism Scale Questionnaire. Champaign, Ill.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Siegelman, M. (1965). ‘College student personality correlates of early parent-child relationships.’ Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 558–64.Google Scholar
Siegelman, M. (1972a). ‘Adjustment of male homosexuals and heterosexuals.’ Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 2, 9–25.Google Scholar
Siegelman, M. (1972b). ‘Parental background of male homosexuals and heterosexuals.’ Archives of Sexual Behaviour. In press.Google Scholar
Siegelman, M. (1972c). ‘Adjustment of homosexual and heterosexual women.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 120, 477–81.Google Scholar
Socarides, C. W. (1963). ‘The historical development of theoretical and clinical concepts of overt female homosexuality.’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 11, 385–414.Google Scholar
Socarides, C. W. (1968). The Overt Homosexual. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Struening, E. I., and Richardson, A. H. (1965). ‘A factor analytic exploration of the alienation, anomia and authoritarian domain.’ American Sociological Review, 30, 768–78.Google Scholar
Thompson, N. L. (1971). ‘Family background and sexual identity in male and female homosexuals.’ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University.Google Scholar
Tryon, R. C. (1957). ‘Reliability and behavior domain validity: reformulation and historical critique.’ Psychological Bulletin, 54, 229–249.Google Scholar
Wiedeman, G. H. (1962). ‘Survey of psychoanalytic literature on overt male homosexuality.’ Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 10, 386–409.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.