Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:43:45.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paranoid Psychoses

The Stability of Nosological Categories Illustrated by a Personal Follow-up Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

N. Retterstöl
N. Retterstöl*
Affiliation:
Reader in Psychiatry, University of Oslo: Psychiatric Department, Vinderen, Oslo 3, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the present paper the author will try to elucidate the stability of nosological categories as revealed by a personal follow-up investigation of 301 previously hospitalized patients with paranoid psychoses. Since the terminology used will be the Scandinavian one, a short review of the diagnostic concepts will be given. The Scandinavian concept of schizophrenia is rather narrower than that employed in the rest of Europe, and especially narrower than that prevailing in the Anglo-American literature. Many American authors include in their concept of schizophrenia what may be called “the schizophrenic reaction types”. In the present paper, the concept of schizophrenia used by Langfeldt (1937, 1939), sometimes, referred to as “process schizophrenia” or “nuclear schizophrenia” is used. “Primary symptoms” occur in clear consciousness; these include disturbances of thinking, disintegration of emotions, autism, marked feeling of influence and passivity, massive depersonalization and derealization. As a rule the illness has an insidious development and a chronic course ending up with a greater or lesser degree of mental deterioration.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 114 , Issue 510 , May 1968 , pp. 553 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1968 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achté, K. A. (1961). “Der Verlauf der Schizophrenien und dcr schizophreniformen Psychosen.” Acta psychiat. Scand., Suppl. 155.Google Scholar
Astrup, C., Fossum, A., and Holmboe, R. (1962). Prognosis in Functional Psychosis. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas.Google Scholar
Astrup, C., Fossum, A., and Noreik, K. (1966). Functional Psychoses: Diagnostic and Prognostic Models. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas.Google Scholar
Eitinger, L. (1958). Psykiatriske Undersökelser blant Flyktninger i Norge. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Eitinger, L., Laane, C. L., and Langfeldt, G. (1958). “The prognostic value of the clinical picture and the therapeutic value of physical treatment in schizophrenia and the schizophreniform states.” Acta psychiat. Scand., 33, 33–53.Google Scholar
Eitinger, L., Laane, C. L., and Langfeldt, G. (1964). Concentration Camp Survivors in Norway and Israel. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Færgeman, P. M. (1945). De Psykogene Psykoser. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Færgeman, P. M. (1963). Psychogenic Psychoses. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Johanson, E. (1958). “A study of schizophrenia in the male.” Acta psychiat. Scand., Suppl. 125.Google Scholar
Kasanin, J. (1933). “The acute schizoaffective psychoses.” Amer. J. Psychiat., 13, 97–126.Google Scholar
Labhardt, F. (1963). Die schizophrenieähnl∗įchen Emotionspsychosen . (Monogr. Gesamtgebiet. Neurol. Psychiat. Heft. 102). Berlin, Göttingen and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Langfeldt, G. (1937). “The prognosis in schizophrenia and the factors influencing the course of the disease.” Acta psychiat. Scand., Suppl. 13.Google Scholar
Langfeldt, G. (1939). The Schizophreniform States. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Langfeldt, G. (1965). Lærebok i klinisk psykiatri. Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Lunn, V. (1953). “Paranoide tilstande.” Nord. Med., 49, 831–838.Google Scholar
Ødegård, Ø. (1966). “An official diagnostic classification in actual hospital practice.” Acta psychiat. Scand., 42, 329–337.Google Scholar
Retterstöl, N. (1966). “Paranoid and paranoiac psychoses. A personal follow-up investigation with special reference to aetiological, clinical and prognostic aspects.” Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; Springfield, Ill.: Thomas.Google Scholar
Rodnick, E. H., and Garmezy, N. (1957). “An experimental approach to the study of motivation in schizophrenia.” In: Jones, M. R. (ed.) (1957). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, Nebraska, pp. 109–183.Google Scholar
Stengel, E. (1960). Classification of Mental Disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Strømgren, E. (1940). Episodiske psykoser. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Strømgren, E. (1961). Psykiatri. 7. udg. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Strømgren, E. (1965). “Schizophreniform psychoses.” Acta psychiat. Scand., 41, 483–489.Google Scholar
Vaillant, G. E. (1964). “An historical review of the remitting schizophrenia.” J. nerv. ment. Dis., 135, 534–543.Google Scholar
Widlocher, D. (1958). “Psychoses réactionelles.” Encéphale, 47, 533, I–IX.Google Scholar
Wimmer, A. (1916). Psykogene Sindssygdomsformer. Copenhagen: St. Hans Hospitals Jubilæumsskrift.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1955). Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death. 7. rev., Geneva (8 rev. unpublished).Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.