Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:04:04.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overinclusive Thought Disorder in Chronic Schizophrenics and its Response to ‘Proketazine’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

R. W. Payne ,
D. Friedlander ,
S. G. Laverty  and
P. Haden
R. W. Payne
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
D. Friedlander
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
S. G. Laverty
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
P. Haden
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Studies using objective tests have found that two relatively independent types of thought disorder occur in patients diagnosed as “schizophrenic”. In several studies (Payne, 1961) approximately half the acute schizophrenic patients showed an extreme degree of intellectual and motor retardation, more severe than that found even among retarded depressed patients, while half suffered from overinclusive thinking, as measured by the tests used. There was a significant tendency in one study (Payne and Hewlett, 1960) for these two types of thought disorder not to occur in the same acute schizophrenic patients.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 109 , Issue 461 , July 1963 , pp. 523 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

This study complements a series of studies carried out with the assistance of Canadian Dominion-Provincial Mental Health Grant No. 605-5-286.

‘Proketazine’ is made by John Wyeth and Brother (Canada) Ltd., who kindly assisted with this study, supplying generous amounts of the compounds used.

References

1. Benjamin, J. D., “A method for distinguishing and evaluating formal thinking disorders in schizophrenia”, in: J. S. Kasanin (ed.), Language and Thought in Schizophrenia, 1946. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2. Cameron, N., “Reasoning, regression and communication in schizophrenics”, Psychol. Monogr., 1938, 50, No. 221, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Cameron, N., “Deterioration and regression in schizophrenic thinking”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1939, 34, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Goldstein, K., and Scheerer, M., “Abstract and concrete behavior, an experimental study with special tests”, Psychol. Monogr., 1941, 53, No. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Payne, R. W., “Cognitive abnormalities”, in: H. J. Eysenck (ed.), Handbook of Abnormal Psychology, 1961. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
6. Payne, R. W., “An object Classification test as a measure of overinclusive thinking in schizophrenic patients”, Brit. J. soc. clin. Psychol., 1962, 1, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Payne, R. W. and Hewlett, J. H. G., “Thought disorder in psychotic patients”, in: H. J. Eysenck (ed.), Experiments in Personality, 1960. Vol. II. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
8. Payne, R. W., Matussek, P., and George, E. I., “An experimental study of schizophrenic thought disorder”, J. Ment. Sci., 1959, 105, 627–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Raven, J. C., Guide to Using the Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale with the Progressive Matrices Scales, 1958. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.