Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:44:32.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outcome in schizophrenia and related disorders compared between developing and developed countries

A recursive partitioning re-analysis of the WHO DOSMD data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

Thomas J. Craig ,
Carole Siegel ,
Kim Hopper ,
Shang Lin  and
Norman Sartorius
Thomas J. Craig*
Affiliation:
Brooklyn VA Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
Carole Siegel
Affiliation:
Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York
Kim Hopper
Affiliation:
Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York
Shang Lin
Affiliation:
Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York
Norman Sartorius
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Geneva, Switzerland
*
Dr Carole Siegel, Head, Epidemiology and Health Services Research Laboratory, Statistical Sciences & Epidemiology Division, The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Road, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Data on the two-year pattern of course of illness have been collected in the WHO study of the Determinants of Outcomes of Severe Mental Disorder (DOSMD). These data are reanalysed using recursive partitioning, a method not yet applied to psychiatric data to test the hypothesis that subjects from participating centres in developing countries had better outcomes than those in developed countries.

Method

Subjects were those from the DOSMD study for whom two-year follow-up data were available (n = 1056). The classification and regression trees recursive partitioning technique was used to examine the predictor variables associated with the outcome variable two year pattern of course.

Results

Pattern of course was best predicted by centre, but two developed centres (Prague and Nottingham) grouped with the developing country centres excluding Cali, having better outcomes than in the remaining developed country centres and Cali. Type of onset (insidious v. non-insidious) was the next strongest predictor, but its effect differed across these two centre groupings. Effects for some groups were modified by other predictor variables, including age, child and/or adolescent problems, and gender.

Conclusions

The predominant predictor effects on two-year pattern of course continued to be centre and type of onset, but complex interactions between these variables and other predictor variables are seen in specific centre groupings not strictly defined by ‘developing’ and ‘developed’.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 170 , Issue 3 , March 1997 , pp. 229 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bleuler, M. (1978) The Schizophrenic Disorder: Long-Term Patient and Family Studies. New Haven. CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., et al (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Clompi, L. (1980) The natural history of schizophrenia in the long term. British Journal of Psychiatry. 134, 413–420.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A. & Pregibon, D. (1992) Tree-based models. In Statistical Models 5 (eds Chambers, J. M. & Hastie, T. J.), pp. 377–420. Pacific Grove. CA: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Edgerton, R. B. & Cohen, A. (1994) Culture and schizophrenia: The DOSMD challenge. British Journal of Psychiatry. 144, 222–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, L., Cook, E. F., Brand, D. A., et al (1988) A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain. New England Journal of Medicine. 318, 797–803.Google Scholar
Harding, C. M., Brooks, G. W., Ashikaza, T., et al (1987) The Vermont Longitudinal Study of Pfersons with Severe Mental Illness: II: Long term outcomes of subjects who retrospectively met DSM – III criteria for schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry. 144, 727–735.Google Scholar
Hopper, K. (1991) Some old questions for the new cross-cultural psychiatry. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 5, 299–329.Google Scholar
Huber, G., Gross, G. & Scheittler, R. (1975) A long term follow up study of schizophrenia: Psychiatric course of illness and prognosis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavico. 52, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jablensky, A. (1989) Epidemiology and cross cultural aspects of schizophrenia. Psychiatric Annals, 10, 516–524.Google Scholar
Jablensky, A., Sartorius, N., Emberg, G., et al (1992) Schizophrenia: Manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures. A Warid Health Organization ten-country study. Psychological Medicine. Monograph Supplement, 20, 1–97.Google Scholar
Klein, S. P. & Rolph, J. E. (1991) Relationship of offender and victim race to death penalty sentences in California, jurimetrics. 32, 33–44.Google Scholar
McGlashan, T. H. (1986) Predictors of shorter-, medium-, and longer-term outcome in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry. 143, 50–55.Google Scholar
Sartorius, N., Gulbinat, W., Harrison, G., et al (1994) Long term follow up of schizophrenia in 16 countries; A description of the International Study of Schizophrenia conducted by the Warid Health Organization. Sodal Psychiatry and psychiatric Epidemiology 31, 249–258.Google Scholar
Warner, R. (1994) Recovery from Schizophrenia. (2nd edn), pp. 151 155. New York; Routledge.Google Scholar
Worid Heelth Organization (1973) Report of the International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia. Geneva; WHO.Google Scholar
Worid Heelth Organization (1979) Schizophrenia: An International Follow-Up Study. New York; John Wiley.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974) Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.