Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:50:09.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Omnipotence of Voices II: the Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Paul Chadwick  and
Max Birchwood
Paul Chadwick*
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham and Northern Birmingham Mental Health NHS Trust
Max Birchwood
Affiliation:
Archer Centre, Northern Birmingham Mental Health NHS Trust, and Academic Unit of Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham
*
Dr Paul Chadwick, Northern Birmingham Mental Health NHS Trust, All Saints Hospital, Lodge Road, Winson Green, Birmingham B18 5SD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Background

We describe the development and psychometric investigation of the Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ), a self-report measure of how people understand and respond to their voices. The measure is unique in being driven by and gathering data essential to a cognitive formulation of voices.

Method

Sixty subjects with chronic hallucinatory voices took part.

Results

Psychometric properties of the scales were established, including test-retest reliability (mean = 0.89), internal reliability (mean Cronbach's α = 0.85), and construct validity using factor analysis and the criterion group method.

Conclusions

The BAVQ was found to be easy to complete and the scale may aid clinical assessment of voices, not least because of the possible value of cognitive therapy as a treatment approach.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 166 , Issue 6 , June 1995 , pp. 773 - 776
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn, revised) (DSM–III–R). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Chadwick, P. D. J. & Birchwood, M. J. (1994) The omnipotence of voices: a cognitive approach to auditory hallucinations. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 190–201.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. & Morley, S. (1989) The cognitive behavioural treatment of hallucinations and delusions: a preliminary study. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 17, 267–282.Google Scholar
Garety, P. A. (1991) Reasoning and delusions. British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, (suppl. 10), 14–18.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. (1945) A basis for analysing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 252–282.Google Scholar
Haddock, G., Bentall, R. & Slade, P. (1993) Psychological treatment of chronic auditory hallucinations: two case studies. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 21, 335–346.Google Scholar
Kingdon, D. & Turkington, K. (1991) The use of cognitive-behaviour therapy with a normalising rationale in schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 207–211.Google Scholar
Strauss, J. S. (1969) Hallucinations and delusions as points on continua functions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 21, 581–586.Google Scholar
Winer, B. J. (1971) Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.