Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:30:22.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

[No Title]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

D. M. Hambridge*
Affiliation:
9 Weavervale Park, Warrington Road, Bartington, Northwich, Cheshire CW8 4QU, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

The study by Jones et al (Reference Jones, Vermaas and McCartney2003) adds an interesting perspective on the concept of PTSD. However, there are methodological matters that concern me.

First, why are no subjects included from the Falklands Conflict of 1982? Jones et al cite O’Brien & Hughes (Reference O'Brien and Hughes1991), whose work suggests that a much higher incidence of flashbacks might be found among that population.

Second, how many raters were used to confirm the existence of PTSD symptoms in the case records? What were the interrater reliabilities? How was any disagreement resolved?

Third, during my brief sojourn as Medical Member (Psychiatrist) of the War Pensions Appeal Tribunals, I studied in detail some 80 War Pension Agency case records, many for non-psychological cases. My overriding concern was the lack of symptom recording. Frequently, the relevant questions on War Pension Agency medical assessments concerning mental state received one-word answers, or were deleted entirely. How did these researchers deal with such cases?

Footnotes

EDITED BY STANLEY ZAMMIT

References

Jones, E. Vermaas, R. H. McCartney, H. et al (2003) Flashbacks and post-traumatic stress disorder: the genesis of a 20th-century diagnosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 158163.Google Scholar
O'Brien, L. S. & Hughes, S.J. (1991) Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in Falklands veterans five years after the conflict. British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 135141.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.