Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:59:10.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

More trouble with ethics committees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

A. Cohen
A. Cohen*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, Salomons Centre, Broomhill Road, Southborough, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN3 0TG
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Columns
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 175 , Issue 4 , October 1999 , pp. 393
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

References

Garfield, P. (1995) Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committees. British Medical Journal, 311, 660–661.Google Scholar
Gilbert, C., Fulford, K. W. M. & Parker, C. (1989) Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees. British Medical Journal, 299, 1437–1439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Middle, C., Johnson, A., Petty, T., et al (1995) Ethics approval for a national postal survey: recent experience. British Medical Journal, 311, 659–660.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.