Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-rdph2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-31T06:44:51.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meritocracy in psychiatry training: abandoning the common good: commentary, Rogers et al

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2025

Jonathan P. Rogers*
Affiliation:
University College London, London, UK
Talia Eilon
Affiliation:
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
Ishaac Awatli
Affiliation:
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
*
Correspondence: Jonathan P. Rogers. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Howarth, H, Kennedy, D, Berelowitz, M. Meritocracy in psychiatry training: abandoning the common good. Br J Psychiatry 2024; 225(1): 290–1.Google ScholarPubMed
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaf, N. New allocation system for foundation training leaves doctors demoralised before they've even started work. Br Med J 2024; 384: q720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lock, F, Carrieri, D. Factors affecting the UK junior doctor workforce retention crisis: an integrative review. BMJ Open 2022; 12: e059397.Google ScholarPubMed
Saunders, B. The equality of lotteries. Philosophy 2008; 83(3): 359–72.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.