Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:01:47.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mental Health Review Tribunals

Time for a change?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Helen Crimlisk  and
Michael Phelan
Helen Crimlisk*
Affiliation:
Maudsley and Bethlem NHS Trust, Denmark Hill, London
Michael Phelan
Affiliation:
PRiSM, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London
*
Dr Helen Crimlisk, Maudsley and Bethlem NHS Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 169 , Issue 6 , December 1996 , pp. 678 - 681
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

References

Anon (1995) It's time to act on mental health. The Health Service Journal, Jan. 19th, 21.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, S. & Wessely, S. (1994a) The pattern of delays in Mental Health Review Tribunals. Psychiatric Bulletin, 18, 398–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, S. & Wessely, S. (1994b) Patterns of delays in Mental Health Review Tribunals. London: HMSO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, S. & Wessely, S. (1994c) The cost of Mental Health Review Tribunals. Psychiatric Bulletin, 18, 274–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, C., Marshall, M. & Gath, D. (1995) Why do so few patients appeal against detention under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act? British Medical Journal, 310, 364–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council on Tribunals (1993) Annual Report. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Crimlisk, H. & Phelan, M. (1995) Mental health tribunals (letter). British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 116–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1983) Mental Health Act 1983. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1993) Mental Health Act: Code of Practice. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Eastman, N. (1994) Mental health law: Civil liberties and the principle of reciprocity. British Medical Journal, 308, 43–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langley, G. E. (1993) Mental Health Review Tribunals in practice. Psychiatric Bulletin, 17, 336–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dwyer, J. & Neville, P. (1991) Appeals against section 2 of the Mental Health Act 1983. Psychiatric Bulletin, 15, 225–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peay, J. (1983) Mental Health Tribunals and the Act: A significant improvement? Issues in Criminal and Legal Psychiatry, 4, 37–46.Google Scholar
Peay, J. (1989) Tribunals on Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (1991) Problems of review and discharge: Is tribunal necessary? Journal of the Royal Society of Health, 111, 111–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Psychiatrists (1995) Handbook for Inceptors and Trainees in Psychiatry. London: RCPsych.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. A. (1989) A medical member's analysis of 50 patients at the Mental Health Tribunal. Psychiatric Bulletin, 13, 249–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, L. & Dean, C. (1989) The Working of the 1983 Mental Health Act: The experience of patients, relatives, psychiatrists, general practitioners and social workers involved in compulsory admission. Psychiatric Bulletin, 13, 477–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. & Sharpe, M. (1993) What happens to patients discharged by Mental Health Review Tribunals? Psychiatric Bulletin, 17, 337–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J. (1993) Reform of the Mental Health Act 1983. An effective tribunal system? British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, J. (1995) The challenge of individual rights. Mental Health Review Tribunals. British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 417–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolf, P. G. (1991) The role of the doctor in the Mental Health Review Tribunal. Psychiatric Bulletin, 15, 407–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.