Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:09:09.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Maudsley Personality Inventory as a Prognostic Instrument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Gerdt Wretmark ,
Jan Åström  and
Margareta Eriksson
Gerdt Wretmark
Affiliation:
Regionsjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden
Jan Åström
Affiliation:
Regionsjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden
Margareta Eriksson
Affiliation:
Regionsjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In an article published in 1961 entitled “MPI results in cases of endogenous depression before and after treatment” (7, in Swedish), the authors (Wretmark, Åström and Ölander) showed inter alia that the Lie scale in the Maudsley Personality Inventory (3, 8) has a certain value when it comes to predicting the ability of patients with endogenous depression to regain social function. In view of the restricted material, the authors are careful in their conclusions, but it appears from the article that “high values on the Lie scale can be seen as an unfavourable prognostic factor with reference to the patient's ability to re-adapt to working life after treatment for endogenous depression”.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 116 , Issue 530 , January 1970 , pp. 21 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bartholomew, A. A., and Marley, E (1959). “The temporal reliability of the Maudsley Personality Inventory.” J. ment. Sci., 105.Google Scholar
2. Coppen, A., and Metcalfe, Maryse (1965). “Effect of depressive illness on MPI score.” Brit. J. Psychiat., III, 236–239.Google Scholar
3. Eysenck, H. J (1959). Manual of Maudsley Personality Inventory. London.Google Scholar
4. Ingham, J. G (1966). “Changes in MPI scores in neurotic patients: A three-year follow-up.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 112, 931–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Knowless, J. B (1960). “The temporal stability of MPI score in normal and psychiatric populations.” J. cons. Psychol., 24, 278.Google Scholar
6. Ojha, A. B., Kelvin, R. P., and Lucas, G. J (1966). “The use of the Maudsley Personality Inventory on university students.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 112, 543–548.Google Scholar
7. Wretmark, G., Åström, J., and Ölander, F (1961). “MPI-resultat vid endogen depression före och efter behandling.” Nord. Psykiat. T., 15, 448–454.Google Scholar
8. Åström, J., and Ölander, F. (1960). “Maudsley Personality Inventory (MPI) i kliniskt bruk. Ensvensk version-några testdata och observationer.” Nord. Psykiat. T., Häfte IV.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.