Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:06:31.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mathematical Models for Describing the Clustering of Sociopathy and Hysteria in Families

A Comment on the Recent Paper by Cloninger et al

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

T. P. Hutchinson  and
S. P. Satterthwaite
T. P. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
Traffic Studies Group, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1
S. P. Satterthwaite
Affiliation:
Traffic Studies Group, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The fitting of the multifactorial model of disease transmission to the familial clustering of hysteria and sociopathy by Cloninger et al (1) involved an approximation. This note reports the results of fitting the bivariate Normal model exactly and also two other distributions.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 130 , Issue 3 , March 1977 , pp. 294 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1977 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cloninger, C. R., Reich, T. & Guze, S. B. (1975) The multifactorial model of disease transmission—III: Familial relationship between sociopathy and hysteria (Briquet's syndrome). British Journal of Psychiatry, 127, 23–32.Google Scholar
2 Reich, T., James, J. W. & Morris, C. A. (1972) The use of multiple thresholds in determining the mode of transmission of semi-continuous traits. Annals of Human Genetics, 36, 163–84.Google Scholar
3 Falconer, D. S. (1965) The inheritance of liability to certain diseases estimated from the incidence among relatives. Annals of Human Genetics, 29, 51–76.Google Scholar
4 Johnson, N. L. & Kotz, S. (1972) Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
5 Conover, W. J. (1974) Some reasons for not using the Yates continuity correction on 2 x 2 contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 374–82 (includes three comments from other authors and a rejoinder from Conover).Google Scholar
6 Garside, G. R. & Mack, C. (1976) Actual type I error probabilities for various tests in the homogeneity case of the 2 x 2 contingency table. American Statistician, 30, 18–21.Google Scholar
7 Donnelly, T. G. (1973) Algorithm 462. Bivariate Normal Distribution. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 16, 638.Google Scholar
8 Gumbel, E. J. (1961) Bivariate logistic distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 335–49.Google Scholar
9 Atoji, M. & Clark, F. L. (1964) The generalized Riemann zeta functions and their applications in the calculations of neutron cross sections. Report ANL-6970, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois; reviewed in Mathematics of Computation, 19, 692–3 (1965).Google Scholar
10 Satterthwaite, S. P. & Hutchinson, T. P. (1976) Properties of a bivariate logistic distribution. Report from the Traffic Studies Group, University College London (in preparation).Google Scholar
11 Mardia, K. V. (1962) Multivariate Pareto distributions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33, 1008–15 (corrections, 34, 1603).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.