Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T19:24:23.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Old-Fashioned Electroconvulsive Therapy More Efficacious?

A Randomised Comparative Study of Bilateral Brief-Pulse and Bilateral Sine-Wave Treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Allan I.F. Scott ,
Colin R. Rodger ,
Ruth H. Stocks  and
Anne P. Shering
Allan I.F. Scott*
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh EH10 5HF
Colin R. Rodger
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh EH10 5HF
Ruth H. Stocks
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh EH10 5HF
Anne P. Shering
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh EH10 5HF
*
∗Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In-patients suffering from major depressive disorder (endogenous subtype) were randomly allocated to treatment by either traditional ECT with constant-voltage modified sine-wave stimuli (n = 17) or modern, constant-current brief-pulse ECT (n = 14). All treatments were bilateral and monitored by simultaneous recording by EEG. The severity of depressive illness was assessed the day before treatment, after three treatments, and seven days after the last treatment. The improvement and final depression rating scores, the likelihood of recovery, and the average number of treatments received were virtually identical in the two groups. We concluded that the policy of bilateral suprathreshold modern ECT monitored by EEG is as efficacious as traditional ECT.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 160 , Issue 3 , March 1992 , pp. 360 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, R. (1988) Electroconvulsive Therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anand, M. M., Weller, R. A. & Pardo, M. P. (1986) Patients who do not improve with brief-pulse ECT. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 554.Google Scholar
Andrade, C., Gangadhar, B. N., Subbakrishna, D. K., et al (1988) A double-blind comparison of sinusoidal wave and brief-pulse electroconvulsive therapy in endogenous depression.Google Scholar
Convulsive Therapy, 4, 297–305.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1985) Please can I have my old ECT machine back? British Journal of Clinical and Social Psychiatry, 3, 23.Google Scholar
Bech, P., Gram, L. F., Dein, E., et al (1975) Quantitative rating of depressive states. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 51, 161–170.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1982) Health Service Management Psychiatric Services. Electro-convulsive Therapy: Equipment. Health Notice HN(82)18. London: DHSS.Google Scholar
ECT Sub-Committee of the Research Committee of the Royal College of Psychiatrists (1989) The Practical Administration of Electroconvulsive Therapy. London: Gaskell.Google Scholar
Fink, M. (1979) Convulsive Therapy: Theory and Practice. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.Google Scholar
Maletzky, B. M. (1968) Seizure duration and clinical effect in electro-convulsive therapy. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 19, 541–550.Google Scholar
Montgomery, S. & Asberg, M. (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 382–389.Google Scholar
Price, T. R. P. & McAllister, T. W. (1986) Response of depressed patients to sequential unilateral non-dominant brief-pulse and bilateral sinusoidal ECT. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 47, 182–186.Google Scholar
Robin, A. & De Tissera, S. (1982) A double-blind controlled comparison of therapeutic effects of low and high energy electroconvulsive therapies. British Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 357–366.Google Scholar
Sackeim, H. A., Decina, P., Prohovnik, I., et al (1987) Seizure threshold in electroconvulsive therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 355–360.Google Scholar
Scott, A. I. F., Shering, P. A. & Dykes, S. (1989) Would monitoring by electroencephalogram improve the practice of electroconvulsive therapy? British Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 853–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1978) Research Diagnostic Criteria: rationale and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 773–782.Google Scholar
Weaver, L. A., Ives, J. O. & Williams, R. (1977) A comparison of standard alternating current and low-energy brief-pulse electrotherapy. Biological Psychiatry, 12, 525–543.Google Scholar
Weiner, R. D., Rogers, H. J., Welch, C. A., et al (1983) ECT stimulus parameters and electrode placement: relevance to therapeutic and adverse effects. In ECT: Basic Mechanisms (eds Lerer, B. P., Weiner, R. & Belmaker, R.). London: John Libbey.Google Scholar
Weiner, R. D. & Coffey, C. E. (1989) Comparison of brief-pulse and sine-wave ECT stimuli. Convulsive Therapy, 5, 184–185.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.