Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:06:47.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Guilty but insane: the insanity defence in Ireland, 1850–1995

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2018

Pat Gibbons ,
Niamh Mulryan  and
Art O'Connor
Pat Gibbons*
Affiliation:
Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
Niamh Mulryan
Affiliation:
Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
Art O'Connor
Affiliation:
Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
*
Dr Pat Gibbons. St Raphael's. Celbridge, Co. Kildare. Republic of Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

This is a retrospective study describing sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of an almost complete sample of insanity acquittees in Ireland between 1850 and 1995.

Method

Case records and legal files were examined for each of the 437 patients admitted to the Central Mental Hospital under guilty but insane criteria, and a profile of sociodemographic, forensic and clinical data completed on each.

Results

The number of insanity acquittees has fallen five-fold since the 19th century. Acquittees were usually single males from rural areas, aged in their 30s, who had committed a violent crime while suffering from a major psychiatric illness. Female insanity acquittées were relatively few in number and were equally likely to have been charged with violent crime, especially against their own children. The mean length of detention was 14.5 years.

Conclusions

The insanity defence is rarely used in Ireland, is largely confined to serious offences (especially homicide), and generally results in prolonged detention.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 170 , Issue 5 , May 1997 , pp. 467 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andoh, B. (1993) The M'Naghten rules - the story so far. Medico-Legal Journal, 61, 93–103.Google Scholar
Callahan, L. A., Steadman, H. J., McGreevy, M. A., et al (1991) The volume and characteristics of insanity defence pleas: an eight state study. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 19, 331–338.Google Scholar
Central Statistics Office (1992) The National Census of Population 1991 (Vol. 1). Dublin: Government Publications Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1995) White Paper on Mental Health. Dublin: Government Publications Office.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. S. (1986) Neither bad nor mad: the female violent offender reassessed. Women's Studies International Forum, 9, 79–87.Google Scholar
Friedland, M. L. (1991) The case of Valentine Shortis -yesterday and today. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 159–166.Google Scholar
Hawkins, M. R. & Pasewark, R. A. (1983) Characteristics of persons utilising the insanity plea. Psychological Reports, 53, 191–195.Google Scholar
Utwack, T.R., Kirschner, S. M. & Week, C. W. (1993) The assessment of dangerousness and predictions of violence: recent research and future prospects. Psychiatric Quarterly, 64, 245–273.Google Scholar
MacAuley, F. (1993) Insanity, Psychiatry and Criminal Responsibility Dublin: Round Hall Press.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (1962) The insanity defence on trial. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 33, 636–640.Google Scholar
Wilbanks, W (1996) Homicide in Ireland. The International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 20, 59–75.Google Scholar
Woods, O.T. (1889) Notes of a case of folie à deux in five members of one family, Journal of Mental Science, 34, 535–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (1992) The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Zonana, H.V., Wells, J. A., Getz, M. A., et al (1990a) Part I: The NGRI Registry: initial analyses of data collected on Connecticut insanity acquittees. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Low, 18, 115–128.Google Scholar
Zonana, H.V., Wells, J. A., Getz, M. A., et al (1990b) Part II: Sex differences in persons found not guilty by reason of insanity: analysis of data from the Connecticut NGRI Registry. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 18, 129–142.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.