Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:16:04.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foulds' “Continuum of Personal Illness” and the 16 P.F.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

James McAllister
James McAllister*
Affiliation:
The Ross Clinic, Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Foulds (1965) proposed that the classes of psychiatric illness can be described in terms of a continuum of increasing degrees of failure to maintain or establish mutual personal relationships. This concept of all psychiatric illness as an “illness of the person” centres on processes which occur in the mentally ill that interfere with the satisfactory establishment and relative endurance of adequate personal relationships. Foulds conceptualizes these interfering processes as barriers to achieving “personhood”: they may present as signs or symptoms of psychiatric illness or as abnormal degrees of personality traits. Thus, for example, cognitive disorder would make the schizophrenic unable to cope with the demands of interpersonal situations. Similarly, egocentricity would render the psychopath incapable of empathy and with a tendency to treat “others as objects or as organisms than as persons”. In both examples social alienation is inferred, manifested in the first case as withdrawal and in the second case as rejection. It is Foulds' thesis that this incapacity for mutual relations increases along a continuum from normality, through the personality disorders, neurosis, integrated psychosis (melancholics, manics and paranoids) to non-integrated psychosis (the schizophrenics).

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 114 , Issue 506 , January 1968 , pp. 53 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1968 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, J. A., Innes, G., Millar, W. M., Sharp, G. A., and Dorricot, N. (1965). “A psychiatric case register in North-East Scotland.” Brit. J. prev. soc. Med., 19, 38–42.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1965). The Scientific Analysis of Personality. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. and Scheier, I. H. (1961). The Meaning and Measurement of Neuroticism and Anxiety. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. and Stice, G. F. (1957). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, Illinois: I.P.A.T.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., Tatro, D., and Komlos, E. (1965). “The diagnosis and inferred structure of paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenia from the 16 P.F.” Ind. Psychol. Rev., 1, 108–115.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A. (1964). “Personal continuity and psychopathological disruption.” Brit. J. Psychol., 55, 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulds, G. A. (1965). Personality and Personal Illness. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Jourard, S. M. (1959). “Self-disclosure and other cathexis.” J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 59, 428–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourard, S. M. (1961). “Self-disclosure patterns in British and American college females.” J. soc. Psychol., 54, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E. F. (1953). Design and Analysis of Experiments in Psychology and Education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The Acquaintance Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, L., Broverman, I. K., and Zigler, E. (1966). “Social competence and psychiatric diagnosis.” J. abnorm. Psychology 71, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.