Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:33:40.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluoxetine vs Amitriptyline in the Treatment of Depressed Out-patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2018

G. Laakmann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Munich, FRG
D. Blaschke
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Munich, FRG
R. Engel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Munich, FRG
A. Schwarz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Munich, FRG

Extract

As a result of research in recent years, therapeutic possibilities for the treatment of depressive illnesses have been significantly expanded. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors and selective noradrenaline (e.g. oxaprotiline) or serotonin-reuptake inhibiting (e.g. fluoxetine, fluvoxamine) substances have been added to the classical tricyclic antidepressants, whose mode of action is primarily based upon combined noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake inhibition. Furthermore, the extent to which benzodiazepine derivatives or neuroleptics can be successfully used at low dosages for the treatment of depressive illness is currently being investigated.

For these compounds to be used in an individualised manner, however, agreed diagnostic criteria must be taken into consideration, as well as other factors such as the severity and type of depressive syndrome (mild, marked, or severe, retarded or agitated). For example, the benzodiazepine derivative alprazolam has a therapeutic efficacy comparable to amitriptyline for the treatment of milder depressive syndromes, but is significantly less effective for a severe depressive disorder.

We undertook a study of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (Wong et al, 1974, 1975), in a double-blind comparison with amitriptyline. We particularly wanted to know if the efficacy of fluoxetine was comparable to that of amitriptyline, and whether fluoxetine caused less adverse effects as a result of its selectivity, which remains unchanged even after its metabolisation to desmethyl fluoxetine (Fuller et al, 1978).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chouinard, G. (1985) A double-blind controlled clinical trial of fluoxetine and amitriptyline in the treatment of out-patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 46, 3237.Google Scholar
Feighner, J. P. (1985) A comparative trial of fluoxetine and amitriptyline in patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 46, 369372.Google Scholar
Fuller, R. W., Snoddy, P. H., Perry, K. W., Bymaster, F. P. & Wong, D. T. (1985) Importance of duration of drug action in the antagonism of p-chloramphetamine depletion of brain serotonin - comparison of fluoxetine and chlorimipramine. Biochemical Pharmacology, 27, 193198.Google Scholar
Janke, W. & Debus, G. (1977) Die Eigenschaftswörterliste (EWL) - Ein Verfahren zur Erfassung der Befindlichkeit. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Laakmann, G. (1981) Studienmodell zur Prüfung von Psychopharmaka in der ärztlichen Praxis. Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin, 57, 102111.Google Scholar
Laakmann, G., Hippius, H., Blaschke, D., Überla, K. & Schewe, S. (1982) Tranquilizerprüfung in Klinik und Praxis. Therapiewoche, 32, 15681576.Google Scholar
Laakmann, G., Blaschke, D., Hippius, H. & Messerer, D. (1986) Alprazolam versus amitriptyline in the treatment of depressed out-patients: a randomized double-blind trial. In Drug Treatment of Neurotic Disorders: Focus on Alprazolam (eds Lader, H. & Davies, H. C.). Edinburgh, London, Melbourne, New York: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Stark, P. & Hardison, C. D. (1985) A review of multicenter controlled studies of fluoxetine vs imipramine and placebo in out-patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 46, 5358.Google Scholar
Wernicke, J. F. (1985) The side effect profile and safety of fluoxetine. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 46, 5967.Google Scholar
Wong, D. T., Horng, J. S., Bymaster, F. P., Hauser, K. L. & Molloy, B. B. (1974) A selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake: Lilly 110140, 3-(p-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-N-methyl-3-phenylpropylamine. Life Sciences, 15, 471479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, D. T., Bymaster, F. P., Horng, J. S. & Mollloy, B. B. (1975) A new selective inhibitor uptake of serotonin into synaptosomes of rat brain: 3-(p-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-N-methyl-3-phenylpropylamine. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 193, 804811.Google Scholar
Young, J. P. R., Coleman, A. & Lader, M. H. (1987) A controlled comparison of fluoxetine and amitriptyline in depressed out-patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 337340.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.