Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:59:01.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Family and Marital Study of Hysteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Philip I. Woerner  and
Samuel B. Guze
Philip I. Woerner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 4940 Audubon Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Samuel B. Guze
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 4940 Audubon Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper reports the results of a psychiatric study of the families and husbands of patients with hysteria. In a series of previous publications designed to clarify the diagnosis of hysteria, it was shown that certain clinical criteria will define a group of patients with a highly uniform clinical course and prognosis (3, 4, 5, 9). It was also suggested that the same clinical picture is seen among first-degree female relatives more frequently than among the general female population, and that alcoholism and sociopathy are seen more frequently among first-degree male relatives than among the general male population (1). We decided to extend the investigation to more cases, and to study the husbands of the index cases as well.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 114 , Issue 507 , February 1968 , pp. 161 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1968 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Arkonac, O., and Guze, S. B. (1963). “A family study of hysteria” New Engl. J. Med., 268, 239–242.Google Scholar
2. Cassidy, W. L., Flanagan, N. B., Spellman, M., and Cohen, M. E. (1957). “Clinical observations in manic-depressive disease. A quantitative study of one hundred manic-depressive patients and fifty medically sick controls” J.A.M.A., 164, 1535–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Gatfield, P. D., and Guze, S. B. (1962). “Prognosis and differential diagnosis of conversion reactions” Dis. nerv. Syst., 23, 623–631.Google Scholar
4. Guze, S. B. (1963). “The clinical diagnosis of hysteria” Medical Times, 91, 1149–1152.Google Scholar
5. Guze, S. B. and Perley, M. J. (1963). “Observations on the natural history of hysteria” Amer. J. Psychiat., 119, 960–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Guze, S. B., Wolfgram, E. D., McKinney, J. K., and Cantwell, D. P. (1967) “Psychiatric illness in the families of convicted criminals: A study of 519 first-degree relatives.” Dis. nerv. Syst. 28, 651.Google Scholar
7. Jellinek, E. M. (1946). “Phases in the drinking history of alcholics” Quart. J. Stud. Alc., 7, 1.Google Scholar
8. Langfeldt, G. (1956). “The prognosis in schizophrenia” Acta psychiat. scandi., 110 (Suppl.).Google Scholar
9. Perley, M., and Guze, S. B. (1962). “Hysteria—the stability and usefulness of clinical criteria. A quantitative study based on a follow-up period of six to eight years in 39 patients” New Engl. J. Med., 266, 421–426.Google Scholar
10. Pollitt, J. (1957). “Natural history of obsessional states. A study of 150 cases” Brit. med. J., i 194–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Purtell, J. J., Robins, E., and Cohen, M. E. (1951). “Observations on clinical aspects of hysteria. A quantitative study of 50 hysterical patients and 156 control subjects” J.A.M.A., 146, 902–909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Stephens, J., and Astrup, C. (1963). “Prognosis in ‘process’ and ‘non-process’ schizophrenia” Amer. J. Psychiat., 119, 945–953.Google Scholar
13. Wheeler, E. O., White, P. D., Reed, E. W., and Cohen, M. E. (1950). “Neurocirculatory asthenia (anxiety neurosis, effort syndrome, neurasthenia)” J.A.M.A., 142, 878–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Winokur, G., and Leonard, C. (1963). “Sexual life in patients with hysteria” Dis. nerv. Syst., 24, 1–7.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.